Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033884›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2021

Umbilical cord: an allogenic tissue for potential treatment of COVID-19.

Hugo C Rodriguez, Manu Gupta, Emilio Cavazos-Escobar, Saadiq F El-Amin, Ashim Gupta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06608134 (Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Injections for), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06608134 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Injections for

TypeinterventionalSponsorR3 Medical ResearchRan2024 to 2029Enrolled120ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsUmbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Allograft Intra-articular Knee Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hugo C RodriguezFuture Biologics, 1110 Ballpark Ln Apt 5109, Lawrenceville, GA, 30043, USA.
Manu GuptaFuture Biologics, 1110 Ballpark Ln Apt 5109, Lawrenceville, GA, 30043, USA.
Emilio Cavazos-EscobarFuture Physicians of South Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Saadiq F El-AminEl-Amin Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Institute, Lawrenceville, GA, USA.
Ashim GuptaFuture Biologics, 1110 Ballpark Ln Apt 5109, Lawrenceville, GA, 30043, USA. ashim6786@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1224-2755
Innovative Biologics (United States) · USAmerican Sports Medicine Institute · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USWest Los Angeles College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on health care systems and economies around the globe. Clinical evidences demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection produces detrimental levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and significant systemic organ damage. Currently, there is no definitive therapy for COVID-19 or associated complications, and with the hope of a safe and effective vaccine in the distant future, the search for an answer is paramount. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide a viable option due to their immunomodulatory effects and tissue repair and regeneration abilities. Studies have demonstrated that compassionate use of MSCs can reduce symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, eliminate fluid buildup, and act as a regenerative technique for alveolar damage; all in a safe and effective way. With multiple autologous sources available for MSCs, each with their own respective limitations, allogenic umbilical cord (UC) and/or UC-derived Wharton's jelly (WJ) seem to be best positioned source to harvest MSCs to treat COVID-19 and associated symptoms. As an allogenic source, UC is readily available, easily obtainable, and is rich in immunomodulatory and regenerative factors. In this manuscript, we reviewed the current evidences and explored the potential therapeutic use of allogenic UC and/or WJ-derived MSCs for the treatment of COVID-19. Although, preliminary preclinical and clinical studies indicate that their use is safe and potentially effective, more multi-center, randomized, controlled trials are needed to adequately assess the safety and efficacy of UC and/or WJ-derived MSCs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19HumansImmunomodulationMesenchymal Stem CellsPandemicsRespiratory Distress SyndromeUmbilical CordWharton JellyCoronavirusCOVID-19Mesenchymal stem cellsUmbilical cordWharton’s jelly

Identifiers

PMID33033884
PMCPMC7544522
OpenAlexW3092498369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.