Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033765›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Can accelerated transcranial direct current stimulation improve memory functions? An experimental, placebo-controlled study.

Martin Bystad, Benedicte Storø, Nina Gundersen, Ida Larsen Wiik, Lene Nordvang, Ole Grønli, Ingrid Daae Rasmussen, Per M Aslaksen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07196423 (Glutamate Changes as a New Neurocognitive Marker in Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07196423 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Glutamate Changes as a New Neurocognitive Marker in Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2026 to 2027Enrolled106ConditionsFirst Episode Psychosis (FEP), PsychosisArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Churning Better Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Outcome with Accelerated Protocols: Understanding the Non-linear Dynamics through Metaplasticity.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin BystadDepartment of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Benedicte StorøDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Nina GundersenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Ida Larsen WiikDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Lene NordvangDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Ole GrønliDepartment of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway.
Ingrid Daae RasmussenDepartment of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Per M AslaksenDepartment of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) could improve verbal memory functions in healthy old and younger participants. We hypothesized that active tDCS led to significantly improved memory function, compared to placebo tDCS. Forty healthy participants (20 old and 20 younger participants) were included in the study. We applied a novel stimulation protocol, where six sessions of anodal tDCS were administrated during two consecutive days. Each tDCS session lasted 30 min. The current intensity was 2mA and the stimulation area was the left temporal lobe at T3 in the 10-20 EEG system. Immediate recall, delayed recall and recognition memory were assessed with California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II) and executive functions were assessed with the Trail Making Test (TMT) before the first tDCS session and after the last tDCS session. Half of the participants received placebo tDCS, whereas the other half received active tDCS. We did not reveal any significant differences between active and placebo tDCS in memory functions. However, there was a significant difference between active and placebo tDCS in executive function measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT). This experimental study failed to reveal significant differences between active and placebo accelerated tDCS for verbal memory functions. However, accelerated tDCS was found to be well-tolerated in this study.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive enhancerCognitive neuroscienceLearning and memoryMemoryNervous systemNeuromodulationNeuropsychologyNeuroscienceTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33033765
PMCPMC7533366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.