Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033754›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2020

SOMA-trial: surgery or medication for women with an endometrioma? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and cohort study.

E van Barneveld, V B Veth, J M Sampat, A M F Schreurs, M van Wely, J E Bosmans, B de Bie, F W Jansen, E R Klinkert, A W Nap and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

E van BarneveldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-8248
V B VethDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
J M SampatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
A M F SchreursDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M van WelyMethodology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J E BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, The Netherlands.
B de BieEndometriosis Foundation of the Netherlands (Endometriose Stichting), Sittard, The Netherlands.
F W JansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
E R KlinkertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A W NapDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
B W J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
M Y BongersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
V MijatovicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J W M MaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeiden University · NLMonash Medical Centre · AURijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionsThe objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of women suffering from pain due to an ovarian endometrioma when compared to treatment with medication (analgesia and/or hormones). The primary outcome is defined as successful pain reduction (-30% reduction of pain) measured by the numeric rating scale (NRS) after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life, affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness, recurrence rate, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve, adjuvant surgery and budget impact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Evidence suggests that both medication and surgical treatment of an ovarian endometrioma are effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life. However, there are no randomised studies that compare surgery to treatment with medication. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This study will be performed in a research network of university and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. A multicentre randomised controlled trial and parallel prospective cohort study in patients with an ovarian endometrioma, with the exclusion of patients with deep endometriosis, will be conducted. After obtaining informed consent, eligible patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment arm (medication or surgery) by using web-based block randomisation stratified per centre. A successful pain reduction is set at a 30% decrease on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Based on a power of 80% and an alpha of 5% and using a continuity correction, a sample size of 69 patients in each treatment arm is needed. Accounting for a drop-out rate of 25% (i.e. loss to follow up), we need to include 92 patients in each treatment arm, i.e. 184 in total. Simultaneously, a cohort study will be performed for eligible patients who are not willing to be randomised because of a distinct preference for one of the two treatment arms. We intend to include 100 women in each treatment arm to enable standardization by inverse probability weighting, which means 200 patients in total. The expected inclusion period is 24 months with a follow-up of 18 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsPremenopausal women (age ≥ 18 years) with pain (dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain or dyspareunia) and an ovarian endometrioma (cyst diameter ≥ 3 cm) who visit the outpatient clinic will make up the study population. Patients with signs of deep endometriosis will be excluded. The primary outcome is successful pain reduction, which is defined as a 30% decrease of pain on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life and affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness (from a healthcare and societal perspective), number of participants needing additional surgery, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve and recurrence rate of endometriomas. Measurements will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study is funded by ZonMw, a Dutch organization for Health Research and Development, project number 80-85200-98-91041. The Department of Reproductive Medicine of the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc has received several research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck KGaA and Ferring not related to the submitted work. B.W.J. Mol is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V. Mijatovic reports grants from Guerbet, grants from Merck and grants from Ferring outside the submitted work. All authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning this publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register (NTR 7447, http://www.trialregister.nl). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 2 January 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: First inclusion in randomised controlled trial October 4, 2019. First inclusion in cohort May 22, 2019.

Indexed as

affective symptomscost-effectivenessendometriomamedicationovarian reservepainquality of liferandomised controlled trialrecurrencesurgery

Identifiers

PMID33033754
PMCPMC7528444
OpenAlexW3006395636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.