Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033750›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2020

Self-reported disease symptoms of stone quarry workers exposed to silica dust in Ghana.

Dzifa Francis Ahadzi, Abdul-Rahaman Afitiri, Bernard Ekumah, Verona Kanatey, Abdullah Afedzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dzifa Francis AhadziCenter for Occupational Safety and Health (COSH) Health and Safety Group Africa (HESAG Africa) Cape Coast Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2508-4514
Abdul-Rahaman AfitiriDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Biological Sciences College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast Cape Coast Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-1673
Bernard EkumahDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Biological Sciences College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast Cape Coast Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1381-8189
Verona KanateyCenter for Occupational Safety and Health (COSH) Health and Safety Group Africa (HESAG Africa) Cape Coast Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0787-7951
Abdullah AfedziCenter for Occupational Safety and Health (COSH) Health and Safety Group Africa (HESAG Africa) Cape Coast Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3284-1149
Africa Center · USUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUnderstanding the importance of using personal protective equipment (PPE) and the influence of work-post (working distance to main dust source-crusher) in stone quarries is vital for designing tailored interventions in minimizing workers' exposure to silica dust. Nonetheless, studies on silica dust and disease symptoms in Ghana are nascent. This study assessed how work-post and use of required PPE jointly influence exposure to silica dust and disease symptoms in Ghana.

methodsGeneralized linear models (complementary log-log regression) were fitted to cross-sectional survey data of 524 stone quarry workers in Ghana to assess the joint effect of work-post and PPE usage on self-reported disease symptoms while controlling for relevant compositional and contextual factors.

resultsStone quarry workers who work between 1-100 m and beyond 100 m from the crusher with the required PPE were 90% and 87% respectively less likely to report eye irritation compared with their counterparts who work between 1 and 100 m from the crusher without the required PPE. Individuals who work between 1-100 m and beyond 100 m from the crusher with the required PPE were 94% and 95% respectively less likely to report breathing difficulty compared with the reference group. Workers who work between 1-100 m and beyond 100 m from the crusher with the required PPE were 97% and 99% respectively less likely to report coughing compared with the reference group. Workers who work between 1-100 m and beyond 100 m from the crusher with the required PPE were 93% and 97% respectively less likely to report common cold compared with their counterparts who work between 1 and 100 m from the crusher without the required PPE.

conclusionThere are adverse health implications for people who work in silica dust polluted environments, suggesting the need for a national safety and health policy to target them.

Indexed as

disease symptomsGhanaoccupationalself‐reportedsilica duststone quarry

Identifiers

PMID33033750
PMCPMC7534518
OpenAlexW3092452460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.