Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2020

Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Vocalization Playback in Mice.

Alexandra C Niemczura, Jasmine M Grimsley, Chae Kim, Ahmad Alkhawaga, Austin Poth, Alyssa Carvalho, Jeffrey J Wenstrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra C NiemczuraDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Jasmine M GrimsleyDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Chae KimDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Ahmad AlkhawagaDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Austin PothDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Alyssa CarvalhoDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Jeffrey J WenstrupDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.

Funding

Auditory Information Processing in the Midbrain: Modulation by the AmygdalaR01DC000937 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY JAMES WENSTRUP · 1996 to 2026
$9.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mice, the caller's production of social vocalizations has been extensively studied but the effect of these vocalizations on the listener is less understood, with playback studies to date utilizing one vocalization category or listeners of one sex. This study examines how several categories of mouse vocalizations affect listeners of both sexes to better understand the communicative functions of these vocal categories. We examined physiological and behavioral responses of male and female CBA/CaJ mice to playback of four social vocalization categories: ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), low-frequency harmonic calls, mid-frequency vocalizations, and noisy calls. Based on the conditions under which these calls are emitted, we hypothesized that playback of these vocal categories would have differential effects on the listeners. In females, playback of all four vocalization categories increased stress hormone levels (corticosterone), but only the non-USV categories increased corticosterone in males. The magnitude of corticosterone increase in non-USV trials was greater in females than in males. In open field tests, all four vocal categories decreased central ambulation in males and females, indicating an increase in anxiety-related behavior. Further, we found that the proportions of USVs emitted by subjects, but not their overall calling rates, were affected by playback of some vocal categories, suggesting that vocalization categories have different communication content. These results show that, even in the absence of behavioral and acoustic contextual features, each vocal category evokes physiological and behavioral responses in mice, with some differences in responses as a function of the listener's sex and playback signal. These findings suggest that at least some of the vocal categories have distinct communicative functions.

Indexed as

anxietycommunicationcorticosteronelow frequencymousestressultrasonicvocalization

Identifiers

PMID33033474
PMCPMC7490332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.