ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2020
Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Vocalization Playback in Mice.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive Physiological Responses Fail to Predict Context-Dependent Action Selection in Bats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Activation of a locus coeruleus to ventral tegmental area noradrenergic pathway blunts binge-like ethanol intake and promotes aversive unconditioned responses in TH-ires-Cre mice.Neuropharmacology · 2026Article
- A Squeak Is Not Enough: Female Presence and Vocal Playback Have Contrasting Effects on c-Fos Expression by Dorsal Raphé Neurons in Lab Mice.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Acoustic features of and behavioral responses to emotionally intense mouse vocalizations.Behavioural brain research · 2026Article
- Hidden in plain sound: the scientific potential of house mouse squeaks.Biology letters · 2025Review
- Article
- Rodent tests of depression and anxiety: Construct validity and translational relevance.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Review
- Article
- Predictive Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization Sequences: Uncovering Behavioral Significance, Auditory Cortex Neuronal Preferences, and Social-Experience-Driven Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Listening to your partner: serotonin increases male responsiveness to female vocal signals in mice.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Early-life stress affects Mongolian gerbil interactions with conspecific vocalizations in a sex-specific manner.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Beyond the three-chamber test: toward a multimodal and objective assessment of social behavior in rodents.Molecular autism · 2022Review
- Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Review
- Activation of locus coeruleus to rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg) noradrenergic pathway blunts binge-like ethanol drinking and induces aversive responses in mice.Neuropharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In mice, the caller's production of social vocalizations has been extensively studied but the effect of these vocalizations on the listener is less understood, with playback studies to date utilizing one vocalization category or listeners of one sex. This study examines how several categories of mouse vocalizations affect listeners of both sexes to better understand the communicative functions of these vocal categories. We examined physiological and behavioral responses of male and female CBA/CaJ mice to playback of four social vocalization categories: ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), low-frequency harmonic calls, mid-frequency vocalizations, and noisy calls. Based on the conditions under which these calls are emitted, we hypothesized that playback of these vocal categories would have differential effects on the listeners. In females, playback of all four vocalization categories increased stress hormone levels (corticosterone), but only the non-USV categories increased corticosterone in males. The magnitude of corticosterone increase in non-USV trials was greater in females than in males. In open field tests, all four vocal categories decreased central ambulation in males and females, indicating an increase in anxiety-related behavior. Further, we found that the proportions of USVs emitted by subjects, but not their overall calling rates, were affected by playback of some vocal categories, suggesting that vocalization categories have different communication content. These results show that, even in the absence of behavioral and acoustic contextual features, each vocal category evokes physiological and behavioral responses in mice, with some differences in responses as a function of the listener's sex and playback signal. These findings suggest that at least some of the vocal categories have distinct communicative functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.