Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Serogroups of Dichelobacter nodosus, the cause of footrot in sheep, are randomly distributed across England.

Naomi S Prosser, Emma M Monaghan, Laura E Green, Kevin J Purdy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular typing ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2025
    Article
  2. Rapid serogroup classification of the footrot pathogenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Serological Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Impact of Strain Variation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi S ProsserSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Naomi.Prosser@nottingham.ac.uk.
Emma M MonaghanInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Laura E Green *Institute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Kevin J Purdy *School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1645284Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01870X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012980/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the largest and most representative study of the serological diversity of Dichelobacter nodosus in England. D. nodosus causes footrot and is one of the top five globally important diseases of sheep. The commercial vaccine, containing nine serogroups, has low efficacy compared with bivalent vaccines. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of serogroups of D. nodosus in England to elucidate whether a bivalent vaccine could protect the national flock. Farmers from 164 flocks submitted eight interdigital swabs from eight, preferably diseased, sheep. All serogroups, A-I, were detected by PCR in 687/1150 D. nodosus positive swabs, with a prevalence of 2.6-69.3% of positive swabs per serogroup. There was a median of two serogroups per flock (range 0-6). Serogroups were randomly distributed between, but clustered within, flocks, with 50 combinations of serogroups across flocks. H and B were the most prevalent serogroups, present in > 60% of flocks separately but in only 27% flocks together. Consequently, a bivalent vaccine targeting these two serogroups would protect 27% of flocks fully (if only H and B present) and partially, if more serogroups were present in the flock. We conclude that one bivalent vaccine would not protect the national flock against footrot and, with 50 combinations of serogroups in flocks, flock-specific vaccines are necessary.

Indexed as

SerogroupAnimalsDichelobacter nodosusEnglandFemaleFoot RotPolymerase Chain ReactionSerotypingSheepSheep Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33033301
PMCPMC7546612
OpenAlexW3092485606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.