Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033100›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Formative independent evaluation of a digital change programme in the English National Health Service: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study.

Kathrin Cresswell, Aziz Sheikh, Bryony Dean Franklin, Marta Krasuska, Hung Nguyen, Susan Hinder, Wendy Lane, Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kathrin CresswellUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Kathrin.Cresswell@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-9537
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bryony Dean FranklinSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Marta KrasuskaUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Hung NguyenSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Susan HinderSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Wendy LaneNHS Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, UK.
Hajar MozaffarBusiness School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kathy MasonNHS Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, UK.
Sally EasonNHS Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, UK.
Henry PottsCentre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London, UK.
Robin WilliamsSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-4611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany countries are launching large-scale, digitally enabled change programmes as part of efforts to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of care. We have been commissioned to conduct an independent evaluation of a major national change programme, the Global Digital Exemplar (GDE) Programme, which aims to develop exemplary digital health solutions and encourage their wider adoption by creating a learning ecosystem across English National Health Service (NHS) provider organisations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This theoretically informed, qualitative, longitudinal formative evaluation comprises five inter-related work packages. We will conduct a combination of 12 in-depth and 24 broader qualitative case studies in GDE sites exploring digital transformation, local learning and mechanisms of spread of knowledge within the Programme and across the wider NHS. Data will be collected through a combination of semistructured interviews with managers, implementation staff (clinical and non-clinical), vendors and policymakers, plus non-participant observations of meetings, site visits, workshops and documentary analysis of strategic local and national plans. Data will be analysed through inductive and deductive methods, beginning with in-depth case study sites and testing the findings against data from the wider sample and national stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work is commissioned as part of a national change programme and is therefore a service evaluation. We have ethical approval from the University of Edinburgh. Results will be disseminated at six monthly intervals to national policymakers, and made available via our publicly accessible website. We will also identify lessons for the management and evaluation of large-scale evolving digital health change programmes that are of international relevance.

Indexed as

EcosystemState MedicineHumansLongitudinal StudiesQualitative Researchhealth informaticshealth policyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33033100
PMCPMC7545630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.