Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033093›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania.

Hendry R Sawe, Teri A Reynolds, Ellen J Weber, Juma A Mfinanga, Timothy J Coats, Lee A Wallis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hendry R SaweEmegency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania hendry_sawe@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0395-5385
Teri A ReynoldsIntegrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ellen J WeberEmergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Juma A MfinangaEmergency Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Timothy J CoatsCardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Lee A WallisEmergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-3139
Muhimbili National Hospital · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Leicester · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTrauma registries are an integral part of a well-organised trauma system. Tanzania, like many low and middle-income countries, does not have a trauma registry. We describe the development, structure, implementation and impact of a context appropriate standardised trauma form based on the adaptation of the WHO Data Set for Injury (DSI), for clinical documentation and use in a national trauma registry.

settingOur study was conducted in emergency units of five regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. PROCEDURES: Mixed methods participatory action research was employed. After an assessment of baseline trauma documentation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposefully selected sample of 33 healthcare providers from all participating hospitals to understand, develop, pilot and implement a standardised trauma form. We compared the number and types of variables captured before and after the form was implemented. OUTCOMES: Change in proportion of variables of DSI captured after implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form.

resultsPiloting and feedback informed the development of a context appropriate standardised trauma documentation paper form with carbonless copy that could be used as both the clinical chart and data capture. Among 721 patients (seen by 21 clinicians) during the initial 30-day pilot, overall variable capture was 86.4% of required variables. After modifications of the form and training of healthcare providers, the form was implemented for 7 months, during which the capture improved to 96.3% among 6302 patients (seen by 31 clinicians). The providers reported the form was user-friendly, resulted in less time documenting, and served as a guide to managing trauma patients.

conclusionsThe development and implementation of a contextually appropriate, standardised trauma form were successful, yielding increased capture rates of injury variables. This system will facilitate expansion of the trauma registry across the country and inform similar initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

DocumentationEmergency Service, HospitalRegistriesHealth Services ResearchHumansTanzaniaaccident & emergency medicinehealth services administration & managementtrauma management

Identifiers

PMID33033093
PMCPMC7545631
OpenAlexW3092414169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.