Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033087›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2020

Impacts of social support on the treatment outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuqin Wen, Jia Yin, Qiang Sun

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-centred interventions for drug-resistant tuberculosis: A scoping review.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Poverty and Rural Settings on Catastrophic Expenditure in Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Exploratory Study using Propensity Score Matching.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuqin WenCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University Cheeloo College of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-9325
Jia YinCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University Cheeloo College of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China yinjia@sdu.edu.cn.
Qiang SunCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University Cheeloo College of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of social support on treatment success promotion or lost to follow-up (LTFU) reduction for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB).

designWe searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline databases until 18 June 2020 for interventional or mixed-method studies which reported social support and treatment outcomes of DR-TB patients. Two independent reviewers extracted data and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the OR and 95% CI for the effects of social support on the improvement of treatment outcomes and the heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.

settingLow-income and middle-income countries.

participantsDR-TB patients. OUTCOMES: Treatment success is defined as the combination of the cured and treatment completion, and LTFU is measured as treatment being interrupted for two consecutive months or more.

resultsAmong 173 articles selected for full-text review, 162 were excluded through independent review (kappa=0.87) and 10 studies enrolling 1621 DR-TB patients in eight countries were included for qualitative analysis. In these studies, the most frequently introduced social support was material support (10 studies), followed by informational (eight studies), emotional (seven studies) and companionship support (four studies). Seven studies that reported treatment outcomes in both intervention arm and control arm are qualified for meta-analysis. An encouraging improvement on treatment success rate (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.80 to 3.69) was found when material support was integrated into social support packages and no heterogeneity was observed (

conclusionMaterial support appeared feasible and effective to improve treatment success for DR-TB patients combined with other social support interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140824.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantEmotionsHealth ServicesHumansSocial SupportTreatment Outcomehealth services administration & managementpublic healthtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33033087
PMCPMC7545632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.