ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020
Research hotspots and trends of bone defects based on Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progress and trends on machine learning in proteomics during 1997-2024: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Global trends in gastric cancer and nutrition, 2000-2023: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of global research trends and prospects on celastrol, a principal bioactive ingredient ofPharmaceutical biology · 2025Article
- A bibliometric approach to worldwide scientific production of familial hypophosphataemic rickets in Scopus (2000-2022).Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Versatile application of magnesium-related bone implants in the treatment of bone defects.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Global Research Hotspots and Trends in Advances of the Ilizarov Technique: A Bibliometric Mapping.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
- Research Status and Development Trend of Greenhouse Gas in Wetlands: A Bibliometric Visualization Analysis.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
- Global trends of laser bone ablation: bibliometric analysis of publications from 1979 to 2023.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Highly-Cited Papers on Fracture Non-union - A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Literature (1990-2023).Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging of depression: a bibliometrics and meta-analysis.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of occupational exposure in operating room from 1973 to 2022.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Application of Antioxidant Compounds in Bone Defect Repair.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Research hotspots and evolving trends of barrier dysfunction in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Two Decades' advancements and Research trends in needle-type Sensor technology: A scientometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Knowledge mapping of surgical smoke from 2003 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Periodontitis Nonsurgical Treatment: A Metatrend Study of The Scientific Production and Trends From 2001-2020.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Research Hotspots and Trends of Bone Xenograft in Clinical Procedures: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Past Decade.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Highly cited publication performance in the ophthalmology category in the Web of Science database: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Global Research on Erectile Dysfunction from 2002 to 2021: A Scientometric Approach.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone defects can be seen everywhere in the clinic, but it is still a challenge for clinicians. Bibliometrics tool CiteSpace is based on the principle of "co-citation analysis theory" to reveal new technologies, hotspots, and trends in the medical field. In this study, CiteSpace was used to perform co-citation analysis on authors, countries (regions) and institutions, journals and cited journals, authors and cited literature, as well as keywords to reveal leaders, cooperative institutions, and research hotspots of bone defects and predict development trends.
methodData related to bone defect from 1994 to 2019 were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection; then, we use Excel to construct an exponential function to predict the number of annual publications; conduct a descriptive analysis on the top 10 journals with the largest number of publications; and perform co-citation analysis on authors, countries (regions) and institutions, journals and cited journals, authors and cited reference, and keywords using CiteSpace V5.5 and use the Burst Detection Algorithm to perform analysis on the countries (regions) and institutions and keywords, as well as cluster the keywords using log-likelihood ratio.
resultsA total of 5193 studies were retrieved, and the number of annual publications of bone defects showed an exponential function Y = 1×10
conclusionThe application of CiteSpace can reveal the leaders, cooperating institutions and research hotspots of bone defects and provide references for new technologies and further research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.