Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032634›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2020

Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe.

Krzysztof Piotr Malinowski, Paweł Kawalec, Wojciech Trąbka, Christoph Sowada, Guenka Petrova, Manoela Manova, Alexandra Savova, Pero Draganić, Juraj Slabý, Agnes Männik and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Krzysztof Piotr MalinowskiInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531, Kraków, Poland. krzysztof.malinowski@doctoral.uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-0498
Paweł KawalecInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531, Kraków, Poland.
Wojciech TrąbkaBioinformatics and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Kraków, Poland.
Christoph SowadaInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531, Kraków, Poland.
Guenka PetrovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Manoela ManovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Alexandra SavovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Pero DraganićAgency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Juraj SlabýSection of Pricing and Reimbursement Regulation, State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czechia.
Agnes MännikInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Kristóf MárkyNational Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management, Budapest, Hungary.
Zinta RugajaThe National Health Service, Riga, Latvia.
Jolanta GulbinovicDepartment of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Tomas TesarDepartment of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Marian Sorin PaveliuTitu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reimbursement of orphan drugs (OD) is an increasingly important for country policymakers, and still insufficiently understood, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. The aim of this research was to provide a comprehensive description of country-specific health technology assessment (HTA) policies as well as evaluate the percentage of HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions for oncology OD. In addition, the study was designed to elucidate the impact of reimbursement of these drugs on the public budget and the agreement between HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions in the analysed countries. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data on the reimbursement status, HTA recommendation, marketing authorisation, and public expenses on reimbursement in 2014, 2015, and 2016 for all oncology drugs with an orphan designation by the European Medicine Agency in 2017 in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. The agreement between the HTA recommendation and reimbursement status was assessed using the kappa coefficient. The Pearson's correlation was used to analyse the relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita and reimbursement expenses.

resultsA total of 36 drugs were analysed (25% conditionally approved; 5.56% approved under exceptional circumstances). The share of reimbursed drugs ranged from 11.11% in Latvia to 41.67% in Poland. The highest share of positive recommendations was observed for Bulgaria and Estonia (36.11%), and the lowest, for Latvia (11.11%). The agreement varied from 0.4 for Poland to 1 for Latvia, Hungary, and Slovakia. Expenses were correlated with GDP (0.95 [0.81-0.99]), and not with GDP per capita (0.54 [- 0.136 to 0.873]). Expenses per capita were not correlated with GDP per capita (0.52 [- 0.15 to 0.87]).

conclusionsIn Hungary, Latvia, and Slovakia, a positive recommendation was associated with a reimbursement, and a negative one, with the lack of reimbursement. The reimbursement of oncology OD is associated with a growing burden for public budget, and the expenses are correlated with the total GDP. The highest share of drugs with any recommendation was observed in Poland, and the lowest, in Latvia and Romania. The share of reimbursed drugs was the lowest in Latvia and the highest in Poland.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalCzech RepublicEuropeHealth PolicyHumansLatviaOrphan Drug ProductionPolandPolicyPharmaceutical PreparationsCentral and Eastern EuropeHealth technology assessmentOncologyOrphan drugsPolicyReimbursement

Identifiers

PMID33032634
PMCPMC7545889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.