Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032620›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2020

Imaging in disappearing colorectal liver metastases and their accuracy: a systematic review.

Darius Barimani, Joonas H Kauppila, Christian Sturesson, Ernesto Sparrelid

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Darius BarimaniDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. darius.barimani@yahoo.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8412-944X
Joonas H KauppilaDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-3726
Christian SturessonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-2840
Ernesto SparrelidDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-8328
Karolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 30% of patients with colorectal cancer develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). CRLM that become undetectable by imaging after chemotherapy are called disappearing liver metastases (DLM). But a DLM is not necessarily equal to cure. An increasing incidence of patients with DLM provides surgeons with a difficult dilemma: to resect or to not resect the original sites of DLM? The aim of this review was to investigate to what extent a DLM equates a complete response (CR) and to compare outcomes.

methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and registered in Prospero (registration number CRD42017070441). Literature search was made in the PubMed and Embase databases. During the process of writing, PubMed was repeatedly searched and reference lists of included studies were screened for additional studies of interest for this review. Results were independently screened by two authors with the Covidence platform. Studies eligible for inclusion were those reporting outcomes of DLM in adult patients undergoing surgery following chemotherapy.

resultsFifteen studies were included with a total of 2955 patients with CRLM. They had 4742 CRLM altogether. Post-chemotherapy, patients presented with 1561 DLM. Patients with one or more DLM ranged from 7 to 48% (median 19%). Median DLM per patient was 3.4 (range 0.4-5.6). Patients were predominantly evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) before and after chemotherapy, with some exceptions and with addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in some studies. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was universally performed in all but two studies. If a DLM remained undetectable by IOUS, this DLM represented a CR in 24-96% (median 77.5%). Further, if a DLM on preoperative CE-CT remained undetectable by additional workup with MRI and CE-IOUS, this DLM was equal to a CR in 75-94% (median 89%). Patients with resected DLM had a longer disease-free survival compared to patients with DLM left in situ but statistically significant differences in overall survival could not be found.

conclusionCombination of CE-CT, MRI, and IOUS showed promising results in accurately identifying DLM with CR. This suggests that leaving DLM in situ could be an alternative to surgical resection when a DLM remains undetectable by MRI and IOUS.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsAdultContrast MediaHepatectomyHumansIntraoperative CareMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisContrast MediaColorectal metastasesComplete responseDisappearingImagingLiver metastasesManagementMissingSurvivalVanishing

Identifiers

PMID33032620
PMCPMC7545848
OpenAlexW3091899494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.