SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2020
Imaging in disappearing colorectal liver metastases and their accuracy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dilemma of the disappeared colorectal liver metastasis: systematic review of reviews and evidence gap map.BJS open · 2022Pooled it
- Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases: Should the Treatment Sequence Be Reconsidered for Selected Lesions?Cancers · 2026Article
- Contour-regulated registration framework for Liver CT perfusion images.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect of disappearing liver metastases during pre-ablation chemotherapy on the prognosis of percutaneous microwave ablation in synchronous colorectal liver metastases patients.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Importance of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography as preoperative staging tests prior to liver resection.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy between systemic chemotherapy with and without radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A propensity score matching study.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Pathological complete response of multiple liver metastases from colon cancer successfully treated with conversion surgery: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Complete resolution of rectal cancer with liver metastases after palliative chemoradiotherapy and unplanned surgical resection-a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Changes in Oncological Surgical Principles Driven by Advances in Preoperative Treatments.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of MRI, CE-CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal liver metastases eligible for hepatic resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Assessment of the response to systemic treatment of colorectal liver metastases on cross-sectional imaging - a systematic review.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art.Oncology reviews · 2023Review
- Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Review
- A radiological footprint equivalent to liquefactive necrosis observed in the course of disappearing liver metastases in rectal cancer: A case report and review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- The Role of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound as a Local Consolidative Therapy in Multimodal Conversion Treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Case Series.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 30% of patients with colorectal cancer develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). CRLM that become undetectable by imaging after chemotherapy are called disappearing liver metastases (DLM). But a DLM is not necessarily equal to cure. An increasing incidence of patients with DLM provides surgeons with a difficult dilemma: to resect or to not resect the original sites of DLM? The aim of this review was to investigate to what extent a DLM equates a complete response (CR) and to compare outcomes.
methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and registered in Prospero (registration number CRD42017070441). Literature search was made in the PubMed and Embase databases. During the process of writing, PubMed was repeatedly searched and reference lists of included studies were screened for additional studies of interest for this review. Results were independently screened by two authors with the Covidence platform. Studies eligible for inclusion were those reporting outcomes of DLM in adult patients undergoing surgery following chemotherapy.
resultsFifteen studies were included with a total of 2955 patients with CRLM. They had 4742 CRLM altogether. Post-chemotherapy, patients presented with 1561 DLM. Patients with one or more DLM ranged from 7 to 48% (median 19%). Median DLM per patient was 3.4 (range 0.4-5.6). Patients were predominantly evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) before and after chemotherapy, with some exceptions and with addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in some studies. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was universally performed in all but two studies. If a DLM remained undetectable by IOUS, this DLM represented a CR in 24-96% (median 77.5%). Further, if a DLM on preoperative CE-CT remained undetectable by additional workup with MRI and CE-IOUS, this DLM was equal to a CR in 75-94% (median 89%). Patients with resected DLM had a longer disease-free survival compared to patients with DLM left in situ but statistically significant differences in overall survival could not be found.
conclusionCombination of CE-CT, MRI, and IOUS showed promising results in accurately identifying DLM with CR. This suggests that leaving DLM in situ could be an alternative to surgical resection when a DLM remains undetectable by MRI and IOUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.