Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032594›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Identification of African swine fever virus-like elements in the soft tick genome provides insights into the virus' evolution.

Jan H Forth, Leonie F Forth, Samantha Lycett, Lesley Bell-Sakyi, Günther M Keil, Sandra Blome, Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer, Antje Wissgott, Johannes Krause, Dirk Höper and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. African swine fever virus - variants on the rise.Emerging microbes & infections · 2023
    Article
  16. An Updated Review ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan H ForthFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5319-5436
Leonie F ForthFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2708-2515
Samantha LycettThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
Lesley Bell-SakyiInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L3 5RF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-0477
Günther M KeilFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Sandra BlomeFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Sébastien Calvignac-SpencerRobert Koch-Institut Berlin, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Antje WissgottMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Johannes KrauseMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Dirk HöperFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-2274
Helge KampenFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2754-3171
Martin BeerFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. martin.beer@fli.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0598-5254
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DERobert Koch Institute · DERoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P024270/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/1/00001741Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB) BBS/E/D/20002173Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13N13783Horizon 2020 (COMPARE) 643476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican swine fever virus (ASFV) is a most devastating pathogen affecting swine. In 2007, ASFV was introduced into Eastern Europe where it continuously circulates and recently reached Western Europe and Asia, leading to a socio-economic crisis of global proportion. In Africa, where ASFV was first described in 1921, it is transmitted between warthogs and soft ticks of the genus Ornithodoros in a so-called sylvatic cycle. However, analyses into this virus' evolution are aggravated by the absence of any closely related viruses. Even ancient endogenous viral elements, viral sequences integrated into a host's genome many thousand years ago that have proven extremely valuable to analyse virus evolution, remain to be identified. Therefore, the evolution of ASFV, the only known DNA virus transmitted by arthropods, remains a mystery.

resultsFor the identification of ASFV-like sequences, we sequenced DNA from different recent Ornithodoros tick species, e.g. O. moubata and O. porcinus, O. moubata tick cells and also 100-year-old O. moubata and O. porcinus ticks using high-throughput sequencing. We used BLAST analyses for the identification of ASFV-like sequences and further analysed the data through phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular clock analyses. In addition, we performed tick infection experiments as well as additional small RNA sequencing of O. moubata and O. porcinus soft ticks.

conclusionHere, we show that soft ticks of the Ornithodoros moubata group, the natural arthropod vector of ASFV, harbour African swine fever virus-like integrated (ASFLI) elements corresponding to up to 10% (over 20 kb) of the ASFV genome. Through orthologous dating and molecular clock analyses, we provide data suggesting that integration could have occurred over 1.47 million years ago. Furthermore, we provide data showing ASFLI-element specific siRNA and piRNA in ticks and tick cells allowing for speculations on a possible role of ASFLI-elements in RNA interference-based protection against ASFV in ticks. We suggest that these elements, shaped through many years of co-evolution, could be part of an evolutionary virus-vector 'arms race', a finding that has not only high impact on our understanding of the co-evolution of viruses with their hosts but also provides a glimpse into the evolution of ASFV.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsArthropod VectorsBiological EvolutionOrnithodorosPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAAfrican swine fever virusASFLI-elementCoevolutionEndogenous viral elementRNA interferenceTick cell line

Identifiers

PMID33032594
PMCPMC7542975
OpenAlexW3092348514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.