ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
A qualitative research framework for the design of user-centered displays of explanations for machine learning model predictions in healthcare.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Best to Explain Machine Learning Models to Clinicians: A User Study of Explanation Types.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Explainable AI in hospital clinical decision support systems: A scoping review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The Role of Explanations in AI-Generated Alerts: Qualitative Study of Clinical Views on Explainable AI in Predictive Tools.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nephrology: Current Applications, Emerging Techniques, and Challenges to Clinical Integration.Kidney360 · 2026Review
- An Explanation User Interface for Artificial Intelligence-Supported Mechanical Ventilation Optimization for Clinicians: User-Centered Design and Formative Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Community Health Nurses' Knowledge and Perceptions of AI in Canada: National Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Human-centered explainability evaluation in clinical decision-making: a critical review of the literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Review
- Factors Affecting the Receptiveness of Chinese Internists and Surgeons Toward Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Prescription: Protocol for a Systematic Survey Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Refining a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Infant Sepsis: A Multidisciplinary Team Supported by Human-Centered Design Methods.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Eye-Tracking Characteristics: Unveiling Trust Calibration States in Automated Supervisory Control Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring home healthcare clinicians' needs for using clinical decision support systems for early risk warning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Predictive analytics in bronchopulmonary dysplasia: past, present, and future.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
- Explainable AI for clinical and remote health applications: a survey on tabular and time series data.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
- Evaluating the translation of implementation science to clinical artificial intelligence: a bibliometric study of qualitative research.Frontiers in health services · 2023Review
- Factors Influencing Clinician Trust in Predictive Clinical Decision Support Systems for In-Hospital Deterioration: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Engaging clinicians early during the development of a graphical user display of an intelligent alerting system at the bedside.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Extracting New Temporal Features to Improve the Interpretability of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction Models.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing interest in clinical prediction tools that can achieve high prediction accuracy and provide explanations of the factors leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, approaches to explaining complex machine learning (ML) models are rarely informed by end-user needs and user evaluations of model interpretability are lacking in the healthcare domain. We used extended revisions of previously-published theoretical frameworks to propose a framework for the design of user-centered displays of explanations. This new framework served as the basis for qualitative inquiries and design review sessions with critical care nurses and physicians that informed the design of a user-centered explanation display for an ML-based prediction tool.
methodsWe used our framework to propose explanation displays for predictions from a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in-hospital mortality risk model. Proposed displays were based on a model-agnostic, instance-level explanation approach based on feature influence, as determined by Shapley values. Focus group sessions solicited critical care provider feedback on the proposed displays, which were then revised accordingly.
resultsThe proposed displays were perceived as useful tools in assessing model predictions. However, specific explanation goals and information needs varied by clinical role and level of predictive modeling knowledge. Providers preferred explanation displays that required less information processing effort and could support the information needs of a variety of users. Providing supporting information to assist in interpretation was seen as critical for fostering provider understanding and acceptance of the predictions and explanations. The user-centered explanation display for the PICU in-hospital mortality risk model incorporated elements from the initial displays along with enhancements suggested by providers.
conclusionsWe proposed a framework for the design of user-centered displays of explanations for ML models. We used the proposed framework to motivate the design of a user-centered display of an explanation for predictions from a PICU in-hospital mortality risk model. Positive feedback from focus group participants provides preliminary support for the use of model-agnostic, instance-level explanations of feature influence as an approach to understand ML model predictions in healthcare and advances the discussion on how to effectively communicate ML model information to healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.