Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032554›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2020

E-cigarettes use in the United States: reasons for use, perceptions, and effects on health.

Sakshi Sapru, Mridula Vardhan, Qianhao Li, Yuqi Guo, Xin Li, Deepak Saxena

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identifying Salient Beliefs Underlying Young Adults' Flavored E-Cigarette Use to Inform Campaign Development: Results from an Elicitation Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sakshi SapruDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Mridula VardhanDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Qianhao LiDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Yuqi GuoDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Xin LiDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Deepak SaxenaDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E 24th St, Room 921B, New York, NY, 10010, USA. ds100@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Targeting Succinate Signaling Impedes Periodontitis ProgressionR01DE027074 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GRAVES, DANA T, LI, XIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027074NIH HHS CA206105NIH HHS DE025992NIH HHS DE027074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany researchers claim electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to be a breakthrough invention for tobacco users that aspires to curb their addiction to conventional cigarettes. Claimed to be safer by their promoters, these smokeless devices have become increasingly popular since their arrival on the market among users of all ages, especially adolescents. This paper investigated the trends in e-cigarette usage since the time it arrived in the United States, highlighting the highest surge that has occurred in adolescent e-cigarette use. It also aimed to understand the reasons and perceptions behind the ever-increasing use of e-cigarettes by adolescents. MAIN BODY: With the advent of e-cigarettes and common positive perceptions regarding their use, we are at risk of reversing the years of efforts regarding tobacco control and instead advance towards a new addiction with currently unknown long-term health hazards. There is substantial data showing a significant increase of e-cigarette users in the United States, especially among adolescents. The aim of this review was to explore the reasons behind this widespread increase in the use of e-cigarettes among the teenage population in the US and also to uncover the common perceptions about these new electronic delivery systems. In addition, this review attempted to summarize health benefits and hazards associated with e-cigarette use as it crucial to have the right information among its users regarding the health effects of e-cigarette use.

conclusionE-cigarettes are more appealing than c-cigarettes for a variety of reasons, including cost, choice of different flavors, ease of accessibility, and use and impact of social media. There are also different perceptions among e-cigarette users, including both adolescents and adults. The former group may use them because of the sense of fashion associated with this novel device, and the latter might intend to quit conventional/combustible cigarettes (c-cigarettes) by switching to e-cigarettes. However, it is important to note that e-cigarettes are a recent phenomenon; therefore, there is a lack of many long-term studies that can identify future health risks associated with e-cigarette use. We need more detailed studies that focus on the long-term health effects of e-cigarette use. Moreover, with the ever-increasing usage of e-cigarettes by adolescents (10 and 19 years), it is very important that e-cigarettes be incorporated into the current tobacco-free laws and ordinances. We conclude by stating that e-cigarettes need stronger regulations to prevent youth access and use.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultHumansPerceptionSmokersUnited StatesAerosolCardiovascular healthE-cigarettesFlavoring agentsNicotineOral heathSmokingVaping

Identifiers

PMID33032554
PMCPMC7545933
OpenAlexW3092372727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.