Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032548›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Eliciting women's preference for prenatal testing in China: a discrete choice experiment.

Liangzhi Wu, Yanxin Wu, Shiqian Zou, Cong Sun, Junyu Chen, Xueyan Li, Zihang Lin, Lizhi Guan, Qing Zeng, Sihan Zhao and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Willingness to Pay for Down Syndrome Screening: A systematics Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liangzhi WuThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanxin WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiqian ZouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cong SunSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Junyu ChenZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xueyan LiSchool of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zihang LinZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lizhi GuanZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qing ZengZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sihan ZhaoZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jingtong LiangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Rui ChenSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhiwen HuZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kingyan AuZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Daipeng XieZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaomin XiaoThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wai-Kit MingThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. wkming@connect.hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-7515
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNHarvard University · USJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy tests can be used for the early diagnosis of fetal problems and can prevent abnormal birth in pregnancies. Yet, testing preferences among Chinese women are poorly investigated.

methodsWe developed a Discrete Choice Experiment with 5 attributes: test procedure, detection rate, miscarriage rate, time to wait for result, and test cost. By studying the choices that the women make in the hypothetical scenarios and comparing the attributes and levels, we can analyze the women's preference of prenatal testing in China.

resultsNinety-two women completed the study. Respondents considered the test procedure as the most important attribute, followed by detection rate, miscarriage rate, wait time for result, and test cost, respectively. The estimated preference weight for the non-invasive procedure was 0.928 (P < 0.0001). All other attributes being equal, the odds of choosing a non-invasive testing procedure over an invasive one was 2.53 (95% confidence interval, 2.42-2.64; P < 0.001). Participants were willing to pay up to RMB$28,810 (approximately US$4610) for a non-invasive test, RMB$6061(US$970) to reduce the miscarriage rate by 1% and up to RMB$3356 (US$537) to increase the detection rate by 1%. Compared to other DCE (Discrete Choice Experiment) studies regarding Down's syndrome screening, women in our study place relatively less emphasis on test safety.

conclusionsThe present study has shown that Chinese women place more emphasis on detection rate than test safety. Chinese women place great preference on noninvasive prenatal testing, which indicate a popular need of incorporating noninvasive prenatal testing into the health insurance coverage in China. This study provided valuable evidence for the decision makers in the Chinese government.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAbortion, SpontaneousAdultChinaDown SyndromeFemaleHumansPatient PreferencePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisSurveys and QuestionnairesChoice behaviorDiscrete choice experimentPrenatal diagnosisWomen

Identifiers

PMID33032548
PMCPMC7542883
OpenAlexW3092170547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.