ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2020
Enhanced Jarzynski free energy calculations using weighted ensemble.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Umbrella Sampling Workflows for Fast-Converging PMF Calculations without Artificial WHAM Constraints.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Enhanced Sampling of Buried Charges in Free Energy Calculations Using Replica Exchange with Charge Tempering.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Quality over quantity: Sampling high probability rare events with the weighted ensemble algorithm.Journal of computational chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The free energy of transitions between stable states is the key thermodynamic quantity that governs the relative probabilities of the forward and reverse reactions and the ratio of state probabilities at equilibrium. The binding free energy of a drug and its receptor is of particular interest, as it serves as an optimization function for drug design. Over the years, many computational methods have been developed to calculate binding free energies, and while many of these methods have a long history, issues such as convergence of free energy estimates and the projection of a binding process onto order parameters remain. Over 20 years ago, the Jarzynski equality was derived with the promise to calculate equilibrium free energies by measuring the work applied to short nonequilibrium trajectories. However, these calculations were found to be dominated by trajectories with low applied work that occur with extremely low probability. Here, we examine the combination of weighted ensemble algorithms with the Jarzynski equality. In this combined method, an ensemble of nonequilibrium trajectories are run in parallel, and cloning and merging operations are used to preferentially sample low-work trajectories that dominate the free energy calculations. Two additional methods are also examined: (i) a novel weighted ensemble resampler that samples trajectories directly according to their importance to the work of work and (ii) the diffusion Monte Carlo method using the applied work as the selection potential. We thoroughly examine both the accuracy and efficiency of unbinding free energy calculations for a series of model Lennard-Jones atom pairs with interaction strengths ranging from 2 kcal/mol to 20 kcal/mol. We find that weighted ensemble calculations can more efficiently determine accurate binding free energies, especially for deeper Lennard-Jones well depths.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.