Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032334›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021

Evaluation of 2% Chlorhexidine and 2% Sodium Fluoride as Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Root Dentine Microhardness: An In Vitro Study.

Sangeeta Kulkarni, Mohammed Mustafa, Kiran Ghatole, Ali Robaian AlQahtani, Faris Yahya I Asiri, Ziyad Ibrahim Alghomlas, Tameem Abdullah Alothman, Fawaz Fahad Alhajri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sangeeta KulkarniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al-Badar Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Mohammed MustafaDepartment of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7957-3463
Kiran GhatoleDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al-Badar Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Ali Robaian AlQahtaniDepartment of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Faris Yahya I AsiriDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad Ibrahim AlghomlasGeneral Dental Practitioner, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tameem Abdullah AlothmanGeneral Dental Practitioner, Al-Delam, Saudi Arabia.
Fawaz Fahad AlhajriGeneral Dental Practitioner, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
MNR Dental College and Hospital · INPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAKing Faisal University · SARiyadh Elm University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) as endodontic irrigants on microhardness of root dentin. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this

resultsSpecimens rinsed in 2% CHG showed a significant increase in Vickers hardness number (VHN) values (

conclusionsNaF did not show any significant effect on microhardness of the root dentin. CHG as an irrigant was seen to have a strengthening effect on dentin microhardness in comparison to NaOCl and EDTA, which has decreased the strength of root dentin.

Identifiers

PMID33032334
PMCPMC8184278
OpenAlexW3091869202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.