ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Finding long tandem repeats in long noisy reads.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan-SSR architecture in Acrossocheilus fasciatus links cross-assembly repeat conservation, repeat-unit count variation, and genomic context.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Transposable Element-Driven Genomic Plasticity: Unveiling the Evolutionary Mechanisms of Lifestyle Transition and Ecological Adaptation in Endophytic Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of SalHV-1 Genes by Structure Prediction and Comparison Shows an Expanded Core Gene Set of the OrderViruses · 2026Article
- Accurate Reconstruction of Circular RNAs from Complex Rolling Circular Long Reads with CircPlex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CGC1, a new reference genome forGenome research · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics for the Structural Genomics of Poxviruses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- A comparison of Oxford nanopore library strategies for bacterial genomics.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- A landscape of complex tandem repeats within individual human genomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationLong tandem repeat expansions of more than 1000 nt have been suggested to be associated with diseases, but remain largely unexplored in individual human genomes because read lengths have been too short. However, new long-read sequencing technologies can produce single reads of 10 000 nt or more that can span such repeat expansions, although these long reads have high error rates, of 10-20%, which complicates the detection of repetitive elements. Moreover, most traditional algorithms for finding tandem repeats are designed to find short tandem repeats (<1000 nt) and cannot effectively handle the high error rate of long reads in a reasonable amount of time.
resultsHere, we report an efficient algorithm for solving this problem that takes advantage of the length of the repeat. Namely, a long tandem repeat has hundreds or thousands of approximate copies of the repeated unit, so despite the error rate, many short k-mers will be error-free in many copies of the unit. We exploited this characteristic to develop a method for first estimating regions that could contain a tandem repeat, by analyzing the k-mer frequency distributions of fixed-size windows across the target read, followed by an algorithm that assembles the k-mers of a putative region into the consensus repeat unit by greedily traversing a de Bruijn graph. Experimental results indicated that the proposed algorithm largely outperformed Tandem Repeats Finder, a widely used program for finding tandem repeats, in terms of sensitivity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/morisUtokyo/mTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.