SynthesisNutrition reviews2021
Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of supplemental protein in older people: an overview of meta-analyses.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Ergogenic Benefits of β-Hydroxy-β-Methyl Butyrate (HMB) Supplementation on Body Composition and Muscle Strength: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate or HMB-rich nutritional supplements on sarcopenia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- An umbrella review of systematic reviews of β-hydroxy-β-methyl butyrate supplementation in ageing and clinical practice.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on muscle mass, function, and other outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Pooled it
- Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: a meta-analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Peanut Butter Supplementation on Older Adults' Physical Function: A 6-Month Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Trial
- Application of nutrition interventions with GLP-1 based therapies: A narrative review of the challenges and solutions.Obesity pillars · 2025Review
- Chinese Expert Consensus on Home Nutrition Administration for Older Patients (2024).Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- The parallel mediation effects of nutrition, physical activity on depression and sarcopenia risk among older people with diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl butyrate supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Shifting Trend of Protein Consumption in Southeast Asia: Toward Health, Innovation, and Sustainability.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Review
- CCL2 signaling promotes skeletal muscle wasting in non-tumor and breast tumor models.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- Associations between Essential Amino Acid Intake and Functional Health Outcomes in Older Adults: Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2018.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Non-Pharmacological Strategies for Managing Sarcopenia in Chronic Diseases.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Review
- The nutritional support to prevent sarcopenia in the elderly.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- The power of creatine plus resistance training for healthy aging: enhancing physical vitality and cognitive function.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- The role of nutrition in the prevention of sarcopenia.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextNutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention.
conclusionsTwenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.