Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33031409›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Therapeutic effects of adenosine in high flow 21% oxygen aereosol in patients with Covid19-pneumonia.

Pierpaolo Correale, Massimo Caracciolo, Federico Bilotta, Marco Conte, Maria Cuzzola, Carmela Falcone, Carmelo Mangano, Antonella Consuelo Falzea, Eleonora Iuliano, Antonella Morabito and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Adenosine-mediated immune responses in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dipyridamole and adenosinergic pathway in Covid-19: a juice or holy grail.The Egyptian journal of medical human genetics · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierpaolo CorrealeMedical Oncology Unit, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Massimo CaraccioloUnit of Post Surgery Intensive Therapy (USDO), Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Federico BilottaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-6646
Marco ConteMicrobiology Unit, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Maria CuzzolaMicrobiology Unit, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Carmela FalconeUnit of Radiology, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Carmelo ManganoUnit of Infectious Disease, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Antonella Consuelo FalzeaMedical Oncology Unit, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Eleonora IulianoMedical Oncology Unit, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Antonella MorabitoUnit of Pharmacy, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Giuseppe FotiUnit of Infectious Disease, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Antonio ArmentanoUnit of Neuro-radiology, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Michele CaragliaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonino De LorenzoSection of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Michail SitkovskyNew England Inflammation and Tissue Protection Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sebastiano MachedaUnit of Intensive Therapy and Resuscitation, Covid19 Scientific Task Force, Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Northeastern University · USPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-Cov2 infection may trigger lung inflammation and acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome (ARDS) that requires active ventilation and may have fatal outcome. Considering the severity of the disease and the lack of active treatments, 14 patients with Covid-19 and severe lung inflammation received inhaled adenosine in the attempt to therapeutically compensate for the oxygen-related loss of the endogenous adenosine→A2A adenosine receptor (A2AR)-mediated mitigation of the lung-destructing inflammatory damage. This off label-treatment was based on preclinical studies in mice with LPS-induced ARDS, where inhaled adenosine/A2AR agonists protected oxygenated lungs from the deadly inflammatory damage. The treatment was allowed, considering that adenosine has several clinical applications. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Fourteen consecutively enrolled patients with Covid19-related interstitial pneumonitis and PaO2/FiO2 ratio<300 received off-label-treatment with 9 mg inhaled adenosine every 12 hours in the first 24 hours and subsequently, every 24 days for the next 4 days. Fifty-two patients with analogue features and hospitalized between February and April 2020, who did not receive adenosine, were considered as a historical control group. Patients monitoring also included hemodynamic/hematochemical studies, CTscans, and SARS-CoV2-tests.

resultsThe treatment was well tolerated with no hemodynamic change and one case of moderate bronchospasm. A significant increase (> 30%) in the PaO2/FiO2-ratio was reported in 13 out of 14 patients treated with adenosine compared with that observed in 7 out of52 patients in the control within 15 days. Additionally, we recorded a mean PaO2/FiO2-ratio increase (215 ± 45 vs. 464 ± 136, P = 0.0002) in patients receiving adenosine and no change in the control group (210±75 vs. 250±85 at 120 hours, P>0.05). A radiological response was demonstrated in 7 patients who received adenosine, while SARS-CoV-2 RNA load rapidly decreased in 13 cases within 7 days while no changes were recorded in the control group within 15 days. There was one Covid-19 related death in the experimental group and 11in the control group.

conclusionOur short-term analysis suggests the overall safety and beneficial therapeutic effect of inhaled adenosine in patients with Covid-19-inflammatory lung disease suggesting further investigation in controlled clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdenosineAdministration, InhalationBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansLungLung Diseases, InterstitialMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Adenosine

Identifiers

PMID33031409
PMCPMC7544127
OpenAlexW3092358047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.