Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33031381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

DArTSeq SNP-based markers revealed high genetic diversity and structured population in Ethiopian cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] germplasms.

Selamawit Ketema, Bizuayehu Tesfaye, Gemechu Keneni, Berhanu Amsalu Fenta, Ermias Assefa, Nicolas Greliche, Eunice Machuka, Nasser Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The genomics of t'ef and finger millet domestication and spread.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sampling strategies for genotyping common bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Selamawit KetemaEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Melkassa Research Center, Melkassa, Ethiopia.
Bizuayehu TesfayeSchool of Plant and Horticultural Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Gemechu KeneniEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Berhanu Amsalu FentaEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Melkassa Research Center, Melkassa, Ethiopia.
Ermias AssefaEthiopian Biotechnology Institute, Genomic Research Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopian.
Nicolas GrelicheStatistics for Sustainable Development, Reading, United Kingodm.
Eunice MachukaBiosciences Eastern and Central Africa - International Livestock Research Institute (BecA - ILRI) Hub, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nasser YaoBiosciences Eastern and Central Africa - International Livestock Research Institute (BecA - ILRI) Hub, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-708X
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research · ETHawassa University · ETInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEBiotechnology Institute · USInstitute for Sustainable Development · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] is one of the important climate-resilient legume crops for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa. Ethiopia is believed to harbor high cowpea genetic diversity, but this has not yet been efficiently characterized and exploited in breeding. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent and pattern of genetic diversity in 357 cowpea accestions comprising landraces (87%), breeding lines (11%) and released varieties (2%), using single nucleotide polymorphism markers. The overall gene diversity and heterozygosity were 0.28 and 0.12, respectively. The genetic diversity indices indicated substantial diversity in Ethiopian cowpea landraces. Analysis of molecular variance showed that most of the variation was within in the population (46%) and 44% between individuals, with only 10% of the variation being among populations. Model-based ancestry analysis, the phylogenetic tree, discriminant analysis of principal components and principal coordinate analysis classified the 357 genotypes into three well-differentiated genetic populations. Genotypes from the same region grouped into different clusters, while others from different regions fell into the same cluster. This indicates that differences in regions of origin may not be the main driver determining the genetic diversity in cowpea in Ethiopia. Therefore, differences in sources of origin, as currently distributed in Ethiopia, should not necessarily be used as indices of genetic diversity. Choice of parental lines should rather be based on a systematic assessment of genetic diversity in a specific population. The study also suggested 94 accesstions as core collection which retained 100% of the genetic diversity from the entire collection. This core set represents 26% of the entire collection pinpointing a wide distribution of the diversity within the ethiopian landraces. The outcome of this study provided new insights into the genetic diversity and population structure in Ethiopian cowpea genetic resources for designing effective collection and conservation strategies for efficient utilization in breeding.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDNA, PlantEthiopiaGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationPhylogenyPhylogeographyPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideVignaDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID33031381
PMCPMC7544073
OpenAlexW3092618382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.