ArticleMedicine2020
Effect of fire needle for ganglion cysts: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wrist ganglion cyst enveloping radial artery.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGanglion cysts (GCs) are tumor-like lesions that often occur in the soft tissues, which are mostly caused by the degeneration of mucin produced by the joint capsule and tendon sheath on the carpal dorsal joints of extremities. GCs may appear asymptomatic as benign tumors, but some patients also seek treatment because of the pain caused by these fluid-filled cysts. As a kind of complementary and alternative therapy, there have been some studies published in China which have proved that the fire needle has a better therapeutic effect on ganglion cyst. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of fire needle in the treatment of GCs.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese VIP Information, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched by 2 reviewers from the inception until August 2020. The original study that randomised control trials of fire needle for GCs will be selected and is not limited by country or language. In addition, researches in progress, the reference lists and the citation lists of identified publications will be retrieved similarly. Study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the quality will be performed independently by 2 reviewers who have been trained prior to data extraction. A meta-analysis will be conduct if the quantity and quality of the original studies included are satisfactory; otherwise, a descriptive analysis will be conducted. Review Manager V5.4: (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) software will be using for data synthesis and assessment the risk of bias according by Cochrane Handbook.
resultThis study will provide a comprehensive review of current evidence for the treatment of fire needle on GCs.
conclusionThe conclusion of this study will provide a judging basis that whether the treatment of GCs with fire needle is effective. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202080032.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.