ArticleMedicine2020
Cerebral pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma mimicking inflammatory granuloma: Two case reports.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epilepsy characteristics and outcomes in patients with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Extra-axial primary meningeal pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: a case report.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- Seizure characteristics and outcomes in patients with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalePleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare low-grade glial neoplasm of the central nervous system, which is difficult to distinguish from other neoplastic and non-neoplastic entities. Herein, we report 2 cases of PXA that had been misdiagnosed as an inflammatory granuloma. PATIENT CONCERNS: The first case was a 22-year-old man who originally presented with a generalized seizure 7 years previously. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a lesion in the right parietal lobe, leading to a diagnosis of inflammatory granuloma. The second case was a 43-year-old man who presented with repeated generalized seizures. MRI revealed a nodular lesion in the left temporal lobe. The magnetic resonance spectrum showed elevated Cho and NAA peaks and a decreased Cr peak. An inflammatory granuloma was suspected. DIAGNOSIS: After surgical treatment, histopathological examination revealed PXA.
interventionsIn the first case, after 10 months of anti-inflammatory treatment, the lesion was significantly reduced in size. During the following 7 years, the patient experienced generalized seizures 3 to 4 times annually. To control intractable epilepsy, the lesion was resected. In the second case, conservative treatment provided no benefit, and then the lesion was resected. OUTCOMES: In the first case, during a follow-up period of 14 months, the patient was seizure-free with no tumor recurrence. In the second case, after a 6 months of follow-up, the patient remained seizure-free with no tumor recurrence. LESSONS: The preoperative differential diagnosis of PXA is challenging due to the nonspecific symptoms and imaging manifestations. Considering the potential risk of malignant transformation of PXA, early surgery should be highlighted, and gross total resection is associated with a favorable prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.