ArticleMedicine2020
Ventilator for the management of patients with severe pneumonia: A protocol of systematic review.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abnormal expression and clinical value analysis of long noncoding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 2 in children with severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Effect of care bundles in the nursing of severe pneumonia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study will assess the efficacy and safety of ventilator for the management of severe pneumonia (SP).
methodsThis study will search the following electronic databases in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Scopus from the beginning to present without language restrictions. Two authors will screen all records according to the eligibility criteria; assess study quality; and extract all essential data from eligible studies. If sufficient studies are included, we will pool the extracted data and carry out meta-analysis.
resultsThis study will summarize published studies to assess the efficacy and safety of ventilator for patients with SP.
conclusionThe results of this study may supply a genuine understanding of perspective from a scientific basis on ventilator for the management of patients with SP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.