ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Telemedicine Usage Among Urologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- [First German expert consensus on telemedicine in urology].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Telepathology Development and Stakeholder Perspectives in China: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Beyond the prescription: trends and challenges in erectile dysfunction medications among young adult men.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Applications, benefits, and challenges of adopting teleurology: a scoping review.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Glycosphingolipids as emerging attack points in bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The COVID-19 pandemic and Urology - reflecting on successful initiatives and lessons in Australia.BJU international · 2025Review
- Predictors of Attitudes Toward Telemedicine and Its Usage Among Surgeons: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2025Article
- Adoption and utilization of India's eSanjeevani national telemedicine service.Oxford open digital health · 2025Article
- Prostate volume on computed tomography correlates well with magnetic resonance imaging measurements and is reproducible across rater training levels.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Exploring healthcare providers' perspectives on virtual care delivery: insights into telemedicine services.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Characteristics of men who use direct-to-consumer men's health telemedicine services.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Self-removal of catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Practical Strategies for Addressing Video Visit Access Barriers in Urology.JU open plus · 2023Article
- Characteristics of direct-to-consumer platforms offering erectile dysfunction treatment.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Study design of a phase 4, real-world study (COMPOSUR) to evaluate vibegron in patients with overactive bladder.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Physicians' views on optimal use and payment system for telemedicine: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Telehealth Readiness of Healthcare Providers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Virtual Access to Subspecialty Care.Primary care · 2022Review
- Testosterone replacement therapy in the era of telemedicine.International journal of impotence research · 2022Review
- Patient Satisfaction with Tele- and Video-Consultation in the COVID-19 Era - A Survey of Vascular Surgical Patients.Annals of vascular surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrior to the COVID-19 pandemic, urology was one of the specialties with the lowest rates of telemedicine and videoconferencing use. Common barriers to the implementation of telemedicine included a lack of technological literacy, concerns with reimbursement, and resistance to changes in the workplace. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic declared in March 2020, the delivery of urological services globally has quickly shifted to telemedicine to account for the mass clinical, procedural, and operative cancellations, inadequate personal protective equipment, and shortage of personnel.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate current telemedicine usage by urologists, urologists' perceptions on the necessity of in-person clinic appointments, the usability of telemedicine, and the current barriers to its implementation.
methodsWe conducted a global, cross-sectional, web-based survey to investigate the use of telemedicine before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Urologists' perceived usability of telemedicine was assessed using a modified Delphi approach to create questions based on a modified version of the validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). For the purposes of this study, telemedicine was defined as video calls only.
resultsA total of 620 urologists from 58 different countries and 6 continents participated in the survey. Prior to COVID-19, 15.8% (n=98) of urologists surveyed were using telemedicine in their clinical practices; during the pandemic, that proportion increased to 46.1% (n=283). Of the urologists without telemedicine experience, interest in telemedicine usage increased from 43.7% (n=139) to 80.8% (n=257) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among urologists that used telemedicine during the pandemic, 80.9% (n=244) were interested in continuing to use it in their practice. The three most commonly used platforms were Zoom, Doxy.me, and Epic, and the top three barriers to implementing telemedicine were patients' lack of technological comprehension, patients' lack of access to the required technology, and reimbursement concerns.
conclusionsThis is the first study to quantify the use, usability, and pervading interest in telemedicine among urologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the face of this pandemic, urologists' usage of telemedicine nearly tripled, demonstrating their ability to adopt and adapt telemedicine into their practices, but barriers involving the technology itself are still preventing many from utilizing it despite increasing interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.