Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030768›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2021

Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction.

Fernando J Quevedo González, Brett D Steineman, Daniel R Sturnick, Jonathan T Deland, Constantine A Demetracopoulos, Timothy M Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando J Quevedo GonzálezDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6521-8754
Brett D SteinemanDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7419-6734
Daniel R SturnickDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Jonathan T DelandDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Constantine A DemetracopoulosDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Timothy M WrightDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002386 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Genevieve Giny Fouda Amou ou · 2017 to 2026
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002386NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element (FE) models to evaluate the burden placed on the interaction between total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) implants and the bone often rely on peak axial forces. However, the loading environment of the ankle is complex, and it is unclear whether peak axial forces represent a challenging scenario for the interaction between the implant and the bone. Our goal was to determine how the loads and the design of the fixation of the tibial component of TAA impact the interaction between the implant and the bone. To this end, we developed a framework that integrated robotic cadaveric simulations to determine the ankle kinematics, musculoskeletal models to determine the ankle joint loads, and FE models to evaluate the interaction between TAA and the bone. We compared the bone-implant micromotion and the risk of bone failure of three common fixation designs for the tibial component of TAA: spikes, a stem, and a keel. We found that the most critical conditions for the interaction between the implant and the bone were dependent on the specimen and the fixation design, but always involved submaximal forces and large moments. We also found that while the fixation design influenced the distribution and the peak value of bone-implant micromotion, the amount of bone at risk of failure was specimen dependent. To account for the most critical conditions for the interaction between the implant and the bone, our results support simulating multiple specimens under complex loading profiles that include multiaxial moments and span entire activity cycles.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaBone-Implant InterfaceFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalTibiaWalkingWeight-Bearingbone failurefinite element analysismicromotiontotal ankle arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33030768
PMCPMC7748995
OpenAlexW3092244464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.