Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030707›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Elaine M Murtagh, Jacqueline L Mair, Elroy Aguiar, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Marie H Murphy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06410755 (Research on Evaluation of Home-based Rehabilitation Monitoring System With Wearable Devices and Self-Report Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06410755 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Research on Evaluation of Home-based Rehabilitation Monitoring System With Wearable Devices and Self-Report Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsGait Disorders, NeurologicArmsIntegrated Wearable devices Monitoring sys-Assisted Home Rehabilitation Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Music Tempo: A Tool for Regulating Walking Cadence and Physical Activity Intensity in Overweight Adults?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the social life of urban spaces through AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elaine M MurtaghUniversity of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-1403
Jacqueline L MairUniversity of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-8680
Elroy AguiarUniversity of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA. ejaguiar@ua.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-0491
Catrine Tudor-LockeUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, USA.
Marie H MurphyUlster University, Newtownabbey, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-3323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalking outdoors can be used by many individuals to meet public health guidelines for moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. The speed at which adults walk may be a proxy for intensity. Traditional estimates of indoor walking speed are unlikely to reflect self-selected usual or other instructed paces of outdoor walking speed.

objectiveTo inform estimates of pace-based walking speed of apparently healthy adults in outdoor settings.

methodsWe searched four electronic databases for articles published in English between January 1970 and March 2019. Studies that reported walking speed (m/s), cadence (steps/min), or intensity (mL/kg/min) of ambulatory, apparently healthy, and community-dwelling adults (> 18 years) were included. Walking speed categories were defined according to the description provided in each study. Meta-analysis was used to synthesise speed, cadence, and intensity data by slow, usual, medium, fast, and maximal pace (where reported).

resultsThirty-five studies, representing 14,015 participants (6808 women, 5135 men, and 2072 sex not specified), were identified. The mean (95% CI) walking speed for slow, usual, medium, fast, and maximal pace was 0.82 (0.77-0.86), 1.31 (1.27-1.35), 1.47 (1.44-1.49), 1.72 (1.64-1.81), and 1.62 (1.45-1.79) m/s, respectively. Mean cadence (95% CI) for usual and fast paces were 116.65 (114.95-118.35) and 126.75 (121.87-131.63) steps/min, respectively. The mean oxygen consumption (95% CI) for the usual and medium paces was 11.97 (11.69-12.25) and 13.34 (12.94-13.73) mL/kg/min, respectively.

conclusionThese findings provide greater clarity with regard to how various indicators of enacted walking pace, speed, and intensity overlap and how each can be best communicated in the real-world setting to optimise health-related outcomes. Pace-based instructions can be used to support walking in outdoor settings within public health guidelines.

Indexed as

WalkingWalking SpeedAdultFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

PMID33030707
PMCPMC7806575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.