Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Abusive head trauma in court: a multi-center study on criminal proceedings in Germany.

Katharina Feld, Dustin Feld, Bernd Karger, Janine Helmus, Nneka Schwimmer-Okike, Heidi Pfeiffer, Sibylle Banaschak, Daniel Wittschieber

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina FeldInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dustin FeldadiutaByte GmbH, Business Campus, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Bernd KargerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Janine HelmusInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Nneka Schwimmer-OkikeInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Heidi PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sibylle BanaschakInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel WittschieberInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. daniel.wittschieber@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-7488
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WI 5034/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a common variant of abusive head trauma (AHT) in infants and toddlers. Data on the legal outcome of such cases are still sparse. By means of a retrospective multi-center analysis, 72 cases of living children diagnosed with SBS/AHT from three German university institutes of legal medicine were identified. Forty-six of these cases with 68 accused individuals were available and could be evaluated with regard to basic data on the course of the criminal proceedings as well as the profile of the defendants (sub-divided into suspects, convicts, and confessed perpetrators). Criminal proceedings predominantly commenced with a complaint by the treating hospital (62%) and were found to be closed (without judgment) in 50% of the cases, mostly due to a "lack of sufficient suspicion." Of the 23 cases with judgment, the court decided on acquittal in 4 cases (17%). Imprisonment was the most frequent sentence (16 out of 19 cases with conviction, 84%), whereby the sentence has been suspended on probation in 63% of the cases. Suspects and perpetrators were mostly male and derived from the close family environment of the injured children. All confessed perpetrators stated an "excessive demand" as the reason for the violent shaking of the child. The results of the present study are in line with data from other studies with other legal systems. As many criminal proceedings were closed and the 4 acquittals occurred because the perpetration could not be ascribed to a specific perpetrator, improving the forensic methods for such an unequivocal assignment would be desirable.

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaShaken Baby SyndromeAdolescentAdultChild AbuseChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultChild abuseClinical forensic medicineLegal assessmentPerpetrator’s confessionsPerpetrator’s profile

Identifiers

PMID33030617
PMCPMC7782463
OpenAlexW3092460511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.