Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030577›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Gut microbiota composition in relation to intake of added sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages and artificially sweetened beverages in the Malmö Offspring Study.

Stina Ramne, Louise Brunkwall, Ulrika Ericson, Nicola Gray, Gunter G C Kuhnle, Peter M Nilsson, Marju Orho-Melander, Emily Sonestedt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. A conserved peptidase governs glucose homeostasis inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stina RamneDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. stina.ramne@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4494
Louise BrunkwallDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ulrika EricsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-4318
Nicola GrayCenter of Computational and Systems Medicine, Australian National Phenome Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-5245
Gunter G C KuhnleDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-8931
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-8459
Marju Orho-MelanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-2503
Emily SonestedtDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-4562
Lund University · SEMalmö University · SEMurdoch University · AUUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Diabetesförbundet DIA 2018-358European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes 2015-338European Research Council ERC-CoG-2014-649021Hjärt-Lungfonden 2013-0598, 2017-0523Hjärt-Lungfonden 2015-0427Hjärt-Lungfonden 2016-0267, 2019-0555Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0027348, NNF18OC0034386Vetenskapsrådet 2013-210, 2014-366, 2018-02784Vetenskapsrådet 2016-01501Vetenskapsrådet 521-2013-2756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt has been suggested that a high intake of sugar or sweeteners may result in an unfavorable microbiota composition; however, evidence is lacking. Hence, in this exploratory epidemiological study, we aim to examine if intake of added sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) or artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) associate with the gut microbiota composition.

methodsParticipants (18-70 years) in the Malmö Offspring Study have provided blood, urine, and fecal samples and completed both web-based 4 day food records and short food frequency questionnaires. The gut microbiota was assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing, processed in QIIME and matched to Greengenes (v.13.8), giving 64 included genera after filtering. Intake of added sugar (n = 1371) (also supported by the overnight urinary sugar biomarker in a subgroup n = 577), SSBs (n = 1086) and ASBs (n = 1085) were examined as exposures in negative binomial regressions.

resultsVarious genera nominally associated with intake of added sugar, SSBs, and ASBs. Only the negative association between SSB intake and Lachnobacterium remained significant after multiple testing correction. A positive association between SSB intake and the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio was also observed.

conclusionIn this wide population, the cross-sectional associations between added sugar and sweet beverage intake and the gut microbiota are modest, but the results suggest that SSB intake is associated negatively with the genus Lachnobacterium and positively with the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio. Larger studies, preferably using metagenomic sequencing, are needed to further evaluate if a link exists between intake of sugars and sweeteners and the human gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdolescentAdultAgedArtificially Sweetened BeveragesBeveragesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSugarsSweetening AgentsYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSugarsSweetening AgentsAdded sugarArtificially sweetened beveragesGut microbiotaSugar-sweetened beveragesUrinary sugars biomarker

Identifiers

PMID33030577
PMCPMC8137620
OpenAlexW3092548217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.