Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030570›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Lipid-lowering medication use and cancer-specific survival among endometrial or lung cancer patients: an Australian nationwide cohort study.

Jia-Li Feng, Xiwen Qin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence of statin utilization in cancer survivors in a family medicine clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jia-Li FengPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Jia-Li.Feng@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-3304
Xiwen QinCentre for Medicine Use and Safety (CMUS), Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia 1073898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInconsistent results of lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) on improved cancer survival need more investigations. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to the drug would be associated with a lower cancer-specific mortality in a homogeneous population who has ever used the drug.

methodsUtilising data from the Australian Cancer database, linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data and the National Death Index, we identified two separate cohorts of 4519 and 3083 women patients with newly diagnosed endometrial and lung cancer respectively between 2003 and 2013. Adherence to this drug was calculated by proportion of days covered. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were used to estimate the multivariable-adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of adherence to LLMs, statins, lipophilic and hydrophilic statins, and cancer-specific mortality.

resultsEach 10% increase in 1-year adherence to LLMs reduced cancer-specific mortality among women with endometrial cancer (adjusted HR=0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) or lung cancer (adjusted HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). The inverse associations remained unchanged in different subgroup analyses. The reductions in lung cancer mortality were not apparent for women who adhered to lipophilic statins albeit better endometrial cancer survival appeared in the lipophilic statin group and borderline statistical improvement in the hydrophilic statin group.

conclusionsAmong LLM users, adherence to this drug is inversely associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality. Together with previous evidence, randomised controlled trials are called for to confirm whether LLMs could be considered as an adjuvant treatment to improve prognosis.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsEndometrial cancerLipid-lowering medicationLung cancerSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.