ArticleJournal of vision2020
Contours produced by internal specular interreflections provide visual information for the perception of glass materials.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Material discrimination relies on context-dependent active sensing strategies.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The identification of materials from patterns of fluid flow.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Low level visual features support robust material perception in the judgement of metallicity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two experiments are reported that investigated how the perceptual identification of glass is influenced by banding contours formed by internal specular interreflections within glass materials. Observers made material categorization judgments for images depicting glass, chrome, shiny black and shiny white objects, and for contour drawings that were created by edge filtering images of glass, chrome or textured objects. Observers rated each stimulus by adjusting four sliders to indicate their confidence that the depicted material was glass, metal, shiny black, or something else, and these adjustments were constrained so that the sum of all four settings was always 100%. The results revealed that the rendered images were all categorized correctly with a high level of confidence. The contour drawings of glass and textured materials were also categorized correctly with a high level of confidence. However, the contour drawings of chrome materials were miscategorized as glass, with an average confidence rating that was significantly lower than those obtained for the glass contours. It is hypothesized that these different contour types are perceptually distinguished from one another based on how they align with the pattern of surface curvature on an object and the smoothness of the contours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.