Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030469›Full record

ArticleAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2020

Rapid electrotransfer probing for improved detection sensitivity in in-gel immunoassays.

Andoni P Mourdoukoutas, Samantha M Grist, Amy E Herr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andoni P MourdoukoutasThe UC Berkeley/UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. aeh@berkeley.edu.
Samantha M Grist
Amy E Herr
Berkeley College · US

Funding

UCSF/UCB Joint Graduate Group in BIoengineeringT32GM008155 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DESAI, TEJAL A. · 1985 to 2020
$12.2M
Advanced Cancer Classification via Single-Cell Electrophoretic CytopathologyR33CA225296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HERR, AMY ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA225296NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein electrotransfer in conventional western blotting facilitates detection of size-separated proteins by diffusive immunoprobing, as analytes are transferred from a small-pore sizing gel to a blotting membrane for detection. This additional transfer step can, however, impair detection sensitivity through protein losses and confound protein localization. To overcome challenges associated with protein transfer, in-gel immunoassays immobilize target proteins to the hydrogel matrix for subsequent in-gel immunoprobing. Yet, detection sensitivity in diffusive immunoprobing of hydrogels is determined by the gel pore size relative to the probe size, and in-gel immunoprobing results in (i) reduced in-gel probe concentration compared to surrounding free-solution, and (ii) slow in-gel probe transfer compared to immunocomplex dissociation. Here, we demonstrate electrotransfer probing for effective and rapid immunoprobing of in-gel immunoassays. Critically, probe (rather than target protein) is electrotransferred from an inert, large-pore 'loading gel' to a small-pore protein sizing gel. Electric field is used as a tuneable parameter for electromigration velocity, providing electrotransfer probing with a fundamental advantage over diffusive probing. Using electrotransfer probing, we observe 6.5 ± 0.1× greater probe concentration loaded in-gel in ∼82× time reduction, and 2.7 ± 0.4× less probe concentration remaining in-gel after unloading in ∼180× time reduction (compared to diffusive probing). We then apply electrotransfer probing to detect OVA immobilized in-gel and achieve 4.1 ± 3.4× greater signal-to-noise ratio and 30× reduction in total immunoprobing duration compared to diffusive probing. We demonstrate electrotransfer probing as a substantially faster immunoprobing method for improved detection sensitivity of protein sizing in-gel immunoassays.

Indexed as

HydrogelsProteinsBlotting, WesternImmunoassayHydrogelsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33030469
PMCPMC7552878
OpenAlexW3081275477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.