ArticleAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2020
Rapid electrotransfer probing for improved detection sensitivity in in-gel immunoassays.
Article in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photosensitive Hydrogel with Temperature-Controlled Reversible Nano-Apertures for Single-Cell Protein Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Electrotransfer of Immunoprobes through Thin-Layer Polyacrylamide Gels.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- 3D projection electrophoresis for single-cell immunoblotting.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Protein electrotransfer in conventional western blotting facilitates detection of size-separated proteins by diffusive immunoprobing, as analytes are transferred from a small-pore sizing gel to a blotting membrane for detection. This additional transfer step can, however, impair detection sensitivity through protein losses and confound protein localization. To overcome challenges associated with protein transfer, in-gel immunoassays immobilize target proteins to the hydrogel matrix for subsequent in-gel immunoprobing. Yet, detection sensitivity in diffusive immunoprobing of hydrogels is determined by the gel pore size relative to the probe size, and in-gel immunoprobing results in (i) reduced in-gel probe concentration compared to surrounding free-solution, and (ii) slow in-gel probe transfer compared to immunocomplex dissociation. Here, we demonstrate electrotransfer probing for effective and rapid immunoprobing of in-gel immunoassays. Critically, probe (rather than target protein) is electrotransferred from an inert, large-pore 'loading gel' to a small-pore protein sizing gel. Electric field is used as a tuneable parameter for electromigration velocity, providing electrotransfer probing with a fundamental advantage over diffusive probing. Using electrotransfer probing, we observe 6.5 ± 0.1× greater probe concentration loaded in-gel in ∼82× time reduction, and 2.7 ± 0.4× less probe concentration remaining in-gel after unloading in ∼180× time reduction (compared to diffusive probing). We then apply electrotransfer probing to detect OVA immobilized in-gel and achieve 4.1 ± 3.4× greater signal-to-noise ratio and 30× reduction in total immunoprobing duration compared to diffusive probing. We demonstrate electrotransfer probing as a substantially faster immunoprobing method for improved detection sensitivity of protein sizing in-gel immunoassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.