Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030438›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Experiences of Serving and Ex-Serving Members With the PTSD Coach Australia App: Mixed Methods Study.

Jane Shakespeare-Finch, Karolina K Alichniewicz, Esben Strodl, Kelly Brown, Catherine Quinn, Leanne Hides, Angela White, Gabrial Gossage, Loretta Poerio, Dimitri Batras and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Scoping Review of Interventions Targeting the Mental Health of Australian Veterans.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jane Shakespeare-Finch *Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4237-1320
Karolina K AlichniewiczRamsey Health, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9117-019X
Esben StrodlQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7149-6395
Kelly BrownQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5138-9165
Catherine QuinnUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-8987
Leanne HidesUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-8460
Angela WhiteRoyal Brisbane and Womens Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-7913
Gabrial GossageDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-8152
Loretta PoerioDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8731-5184
Dimitri BatrasDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-4194
Samantha JacksonMental Health Strategy & Research, Joint Health Command, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2863-8463
Jess StylesMental Health Strategy & Research, Joint Health Command, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8211-8632
David KavanaghQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPTSD Coach Australia is an app for serving and ex-serving defense members and was adapted for the Australian context in 2013 from PTSD Coach, which was created in the United States.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a user-centered evaluation of the app from the perspective of serving and ex-serving members of the Australian Defence Force.

methodsQualitative data were collected in response to questions to participants in 1 of 5 workshops (n=29) or in telephone interviews (n=24). Quantitative data were collected using the user version of Mobile Apps Rating Scale (uMARS).

resultsAnalysis of the qualitative data demonstrated mixed support for the app. While some people found it extremely useful, especially as an adjunct to therapy, others pointed out limitations and cautioned against the app potentially triggering symptoms in people with PTSD. This perceived risk was usually found to stem from frustration with the app's functionality rather than its content. Participants spoke about the helpful and unhelpful aspects of the app and barriers to its use and made suggestions for improvement. Many participants encouraged its continued use and highlighted the need for it to be promoted more broadly, as many were not aware of it until they were invited to participate in this research.

conclusionsPTSD Coach Australia was seen in a positive light by some participants, but others thought it had too much text and the potential to trigger a traumatic response in users with PTSD. A need to update the app was also a common comment as was the need to increase awareness of the app's existence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsStress Disorders, Post-Traumaticarmed forces personnelevaluation, qualitativehealth, veteransPTSDself-managementstress disorders, posttraumatic

Identifiers

PMID33030438
PMCPMC7582151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.