Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030437›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Barriers and Enablers to Using a Patient-Facing Electronic Questionnaire: A Qualitative Theoretical Domains Framework Analysis.

Janet Yamada, Andrew Kouri, Sarah-Nicole Simard, Stephanie A Segovia, Samir Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. User-Centered Design of an Electronic COPD Patient Questionnaire for Clinical Decision Support.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient portal uptake for asthma management.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Primary care asthma surveillance: a review of knowledge translation tools and strategies for quality improvement.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janet YamadaDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4869-2427
Andrew KouriDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2566-9187
Sarah-Nicole SimardDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-7226
Stephanie A SegoviaDivision of Respirology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-5099
Samir GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-6247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic patient questionnaires are becoming ubiquitous in health care. To address care gaps that contribute to poor asthma management, we developed the Electronic Asthma Management System, which includes a previsit electronic patient questionnaire linked to a computerized clinical decision support system.

objectiveThis study aims to identify the determinants (barriers and enablers) of patient uptake and completion of a previsit mobile health questionnaire.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with adult patients with asthma in Toronto, Canada. After demonstrating the questionnaire, participants completed the questionnaire using their smartphones and were then interviewed regarding perceived barriers and enablers to using and completing the questionnaire. Interview questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify the determinants of health-related behavior. We generated themes that addressed the enablers and barriers to the uptake and completion of the questionnaire.

resultsIn total, 12 participants were interviewed for saturation. Key enablers were as follows: the questionnaire was easy to complete without additional knowledge or skills and was perceived as a priority and responsibility for patients, use could lead to more efficient and personalized care, completion on one's own time would be convenient, and uptake and completion could be optimized through patient reminders. Concerns about data security, the usefulness of questionnaire data, the stress of completing it accurately and on time, competing priorities, and preferences to complete the questionnaire on other devices were the main barriers.

conclusionsThe barriers and enablers identified by patients should be addressed by developing implementation strategies to enhance e-questionnaire use and completion by patients. As the use of e-questionnaires grows, our findings will contribute to implementation efforts across settings and diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAsthmaDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronicsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesasthmabarrierselectronic questionnaireenablersmobile phonepatients

Identifiers

PMID33030437
PMCPMC7582145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.