Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030409›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2020

Light Has Diverse Spatiotemporal Molecular Changes in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.

Phan Q Duy, Ruchi Komal, Melissa E S Richardson, Katie S Hahm, Diego C Fernandez, Samer Hattar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Anatomical Methods to Study the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phan Q DuySection on Light and Circadian Rhythms, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-4513-7348
Ruchi KomalSection on Light and Circadian Rhythms, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Melissa E S RichardsonDepartment of Biology, Oakwood University, Huntsville, Alabama.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-5545
Katie S HahmSection on Light and Circadian Rhythms, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Diego C FernandezSection on Light and Circadian Rhythms, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Samer HattarSection on Light and Circadian Rhythms, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3124-9525
National Institutes of Health · USOakwood University · US

Funding

Section on Light and Circadian RhythmsZIAMH002964 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI HATTAR, SAMER · 2017 to 2025
$24.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To be physiologically relevant, the period of the central circadian pacemaker, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), has to match the solar day in a process known as circadian photoentrainment. However, little is known about the spatiotemporal molecular changes that occur in the SCN in response to light. In this study, we sought to systematically characterize the circadian and light effects on activity-dependent markers of transcriptional (cFos), translational (pS6), and epigenetic (pH3) activities in the mouse SCN. To investigate circadian versus light influences on these molecular responses, we harvested brains from adult wild-type mice in darkness at different circadian times (CT) or from mice exposed to a 15-min light pulse at the middle of the subjective day (CT6, no phase shifts), early subjective night (CT14, large phase delays), or late subjective night (CT22, small phase advances). We found that cFos and pS6 exhibited rhythmic circadian expression in the SCN with distinct spatial rhythms, whereas pH3 expression was undetectable at all circadian phases. cFos rhythms were largely limited to the SCN shell, whereas pS6 rhythms encompassed the entire SCN. pH3, pS6, and cFos showed gating in response to light; however, we were surprised to find that the expression levels of these markers were not higher at phases when larger phase shifts are observed behaviorally (CT14 versus CT22). We then used animals lacking melanopsin (melanopsin knockout [MKO]), which show deficits in phase delays, to further investigate whether changes in these molecular markers correspond to behavioral phase shifts. Surprisingly, only pS6 showed deficits in MKOs at CT14. Therefore, our previous understanding of the molecular pathways that lead to circadian photoentrainment needs to be revised.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsCircadian RhythmDarknessMaleMelanopsinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRod OpsinsSuprachiasmatic NucleusMelanopsinRod OpsinscFoscircadian rhythmsipRGCslightmelanopsinpH3phase shiftspS6retinasuprachiasmatic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID33030409
PMCPMC10046259
OpenAlexW3092630123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.