Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030312›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Responding to the ECHO trial results: modelling the potential impact of changing contraceptive method mix on HIV and reproductive health in South Africa.

Jennifer A Smith, Leo Beacroft, Fareed Abdullah, Buyile Buthelezi, Manala Makua, Chelsea Morroni, Gita Ramjee, Claudia Velasquez, Timothy B Hallett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer A SmithMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-8553
Leo BeacroftMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fareed AbdullahOffice of AIDS and TB Research, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Buyile ButheleziUSAID, Pretoria, South Africa.
Manala MakuaNational Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.
Chelsea MorroniBotswana Harvard AIDS Institute, Gaborone, Botswana.
Gita RamjeeAurum Institute, Parktown, South Africa.
Claudia VelasquezUNAIDS Eastern and Southern Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Timothy B HallettMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBAurum Institute · ZADepartment of Correctional Services · ZADepartment of Health · ZADevelopment Bank of Southern Africa · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1194416Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome observational data suggest that the progestogen injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) may increase a woman's risk of HIV acquisition but a randomized clinical trial did not find a statistically significant increase in HIV risk for women using DMPA compared to two other methods. However, it could not rule out up to 30% increased HIV risk for DMPA users. We evaluate changes to contraceptive method mix in South Africa under different assumptions about the existence and strength of a possible undetected relationship between DMPA use and HIV risk.

methodsA mathematical model was developed to simulate the ongoing HIV epidemic and contraceptive method mix in South Africa to estimate how changes in method mix could impact HIV- and reproductive health-related outcomes. We made different assumptions about the relationship between DMPA use and HIV risk, from no relationship to a 30% increase in HIV risk for women using DMPA. Scenario analyses were used to investigate the impact of switching away from DMPA predominance to new patterns of contraceptive use.

resultsIn South Africa, the HIV-related benefits of reduced DMPA use could be as great as the harms of increased adverse reproductive health outcomes over 20 years, if DMPA did increase the risk of HIV acquisition by a relative hazard of infection of 1.1 or greater. A reduction in DMPA use among HIV-positive women would have no benefit in terms of HIV infections, but would incur additional negative reproductive health outcomes. The most important driver of adverse reproductive health outcomes is the proportion of women who switch away from DMPA to no contraceptive method.

conclusionsIf there is any real increased HIV risk for DMPA users that has not been detected by the recent randomized trial, a reduction in DMPA use could reduce the ongoing number of new HIV infections. However, such a change would place more women at risk of adverse reproductive health effects. It is imperative that these effects are minimized by focusing on expanding access to safe, effective and acceptable alternative contraceptive methods for all women.

Indexed as

ContraceptionReproductive HealthAdultContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInjections, IntramuscularMedroxyprogesterone AcetateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSouth AfricaContraceptive Agents, FemaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateHIVhormonal contraceptionpregnancy complicationsSouth Africatheoretical modelswomen

Identifiers

PMID33030312
PMCPMC7543057
OpenAlexW3092164930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.