Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030259›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2020

On-demand mobile health infrastructures to allow comprehensive remote atrial fibrillation and risk factor management through teleconsultation.

Astrid N L Hermans, Rachel M J van der Velden, Monika Gawalko, Dominique V M Verhaert, Lien Desteghe, David Duncker, Martin Manninger, Hein Heidbuchel, Ron Pisters, Martin Hemels and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Challenging the status quo: a scoping review of value-based care models in cardiology and electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The digital journey: 25 years of digital development in electrophysiology from an Europace perspective.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How to use digital devices to detect and manage arrhythmias: an EHRA practical guide.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [Interpretation of photoplethysmography: a step-by-step guide].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The European TeleCheck-AF project on remote app-based management of atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic: centre and patient experiences.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Astrid N L Hermans
Rachel M J van der Velden
Monika GawalkoDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-9062
Dominique V M VerhaertDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lien DestegheFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
David DunckerHannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-6338
Martin ManningerDepartment of Cardiology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-4373
Hein HeidbuchelDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ron PistersDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Martin HemelsDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Laurent PisonDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital East Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Afzal SohaibDepartment of Cardiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Arian SultanDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel StevenDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Petra WijtvlietDepartment of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert TielemanDepartment of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dhiraj GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Dobromir DobrevInstitute of Pharmacology, West German Heart and Vascular Centre, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Emma SvennbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nikki A H A PluymaekersDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-6315
Jeroen M HendriksCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-0824
TeleCheck-AF investigators
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEAntwerp University Hospital · BEJessa Hospital · BEKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of Graz · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERijnstate Hospital · NLRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Liverpool · GBWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DEZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough novel teleconsultation solutions can deliver remote situations that are relatively similar to face-to-face interaction, remote assessment of heart rate and rhythm as well as risk factors remains challenging in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). HYPOTHESIS: Mobile health (mHealth) solutions can support remote AF management.

methodsHerein, we discuss available mHealth tools and strategies on how to incorporate the remote assessment of heart rate, rhythm and risk factors to allow comprehensive AF management through teleconsultation.

resultsParticularly, in the light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is decreased capacity to see patients in the outpatient clinic and mHealth has become an important component of many AF outpatient clinics. Several validated mHealth solutions are available for remote heart rate and rhythm monitoring as well as for risk factor assessment. mHealth technologies can be used for (semi-)continuous longitudinal monitoring or for short-term on-demand monitoring, dependent on the respective requirements and clinical scenarios. As a possible solution to improve remote AF care through teleconsultation, we introduce the on-demand TeleCheck-AF mHealth approach that allows remote app-based assessment of heart rate and rhythm around teleconsultations, which has been developed and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.

conclusionLarge scale international mHealth projects, such as TeleCheck-AF, will provide insight into the additional value and potential limitations of mHealth strategies to remotely manage AF patients. Such mHealth infrastructures may be well suited within an integrated AF-clinic, which may require redesign of practice and reform of health care systems.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAtrial FibrillationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansInfection ControlPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRemote ConsultationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33030259
PMCPMC7661648
OpenAlexW3092441635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.