Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33030085›Full record

SynthesisJDR clinical and translational research2021

Association between Dental Anomalies and Orofacial Clefts: A Meta-analysis.

T Marzouk, I L Alves, C L Wong, L DeLucia, C M McKinney, C Pendleton, B J Howe, M L Marazita, T K Peter, D T Kopycka-Kedzierawski and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JDR clinical and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dental Anomalies' Characteristics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

T MarzoukDepartment of Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8660-7601
I L AlvesDentistry Faculty, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
C L WongDivision of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
L DeLuciaDivision of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
C M McKinneyDivision of Craniofacial Medicine and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7767-7816
C PendletonDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
B J HoweIowa Institute for Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-9735
M L MarazitaCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
T K PeterDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
D T Kopycka-KedzierawskiDepartment of Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
C S MorrisonGolisano Cleft and Craniofacial Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
H MalmstromDepartment of Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
H WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
E T ShopeDivision of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Eastman Chemical Company (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Extending the Phenotype of Nonsyndromic Orofacial CleftsR01DE016148 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARAZITA, MARY L., WEINBERG, SETH M · 2004 to 2018
$19.7M
Molecular Genetic Epidemiology of Cleft Lip and PalateR37DE008559 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 2004 to 2013
$6.8M
Cleft Lip Genetics: A Multi Center International ConsortiumR01DE014667 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIDRAL, ANDREW C · 2001 to 2009
$4.2M
MOLECULAR GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CLEFT LIP AND PALATER01DE008559 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 1988 to 2003
$1.5M
Health outcomes and improved phenotypic characterization of cleft lip and palateR01DD000295 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEHBY, GEORGE L · 2007 to 2009
$1.4M
NCBDD CDC HHS R01 DD000295NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE008559NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014667NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016148NIDCR NIH HHS R37 DE008559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OCs) display a higher frequency of dental anomalies (DAs) when compared with individuals without OCs.

methodsA literature search of indexed databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS) was conducted without language restriction up to and including February 1, 2020. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. Several cleft teams across the United States and Europe were contacted to obtain unpublished data. The eligibility criteria were observational studies with original data that statistically compared individuals with OC without syndromes and those without OC on any type of DA in primary and/or permanent dentition. Random effects meta-analysis through the Mantel-Haenszel estimator was used to evaluate the association between OC and DA based on odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe literature search generated 933 records, and 75 full-text articles were reviewed. Twenty-six studies encompassing 15,213 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant associations between OC and agenesis (OR, 14.2; 95% CI, 9.4 to 21.3), supernumerary teeth (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.3 to 9.7), developmental enamel defects (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.5 to 9.0), microdontia (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 4.0 to 54.6), peg-shaped anterior teeth (OR, 12.2; 95% CI, 3.6 to 41.2), taurodontism (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7), tooth malposition and/or transposition (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.8 to 11.5), tooth rotation (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 8.2), and tooth impaction (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 12.2). The OR estimates of the reviewed studies exhibited significant heterogeneity (

conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, the available evidence suggests that individuals with OCs are more likely to present with a range of DAs than their unaffected peers. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The findings of the current review suggest that individuals with orofacial clefts (OCs) are more likely to present with a range of dental anomalies than their unaffected peers. Understanding the association between OCs and dental anomalies is essential in guiding clinicians during treatment-planning procedures and is important in raising our awareness of the possible need for future dental treatment for patients with OCs.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateTooth AbnormalitiesTooth, SupernumeraryDentition, PermanentHumansanodontiacleft lipcleft palatedevelopmental enamel defectsmicrodontiasupernumerary tooth

Identifiers

PMID33030085
PMCPMC8447105
OpenAlexW3091989767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.