SynthesisJDR clinical and translational research2021
Association between Dental Anomalies and Orofacial Clefts: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JDR clinical and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Putting 'STOP' to Excess Caries of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.International dental journal · 2025Pooled it
- The large bilateral gemination of permanent maxillary central incisors: A rare developmental dental anomaly case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of mandibular trabecular bone by fractal analysis in children born with oral cleft.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- CBCT-based assessment of temporomandibular joint morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Characterization of hypomineralization second primary molar and molar incisor hypomineralization in patients with orofacial clefts.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Characterization of enamel developmental defects in patients with orofacial clefts and their relationship to surgical procedures.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Dental anomalies in cleft lip and/or palate children at age 10 - a retrospective review across three cleft centres: Part 1.British dental journal · 2023Article
- Permanent Tooth Agenesis and Associated Dental Anomalies among Orthodontically Treated Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Carbonic Anhydrase II Activators in Osteopetrosis Treatment: A Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Current Concepts and Challenges in the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Dental anomalies and their therapeutic implications: retrospective assessment of a frequent finding in patients with cleft lip and palate.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Dental Anomalies' Characteristics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Reducing delayed detection of isolated cleft palate-related deformity: a call for routine intraoral examination of newborns.Jornal de pediatriaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OCs) display a higher frequency of dental anomalies (DAs) when compared with individuals without OCs.
methodsA literature search of indexed databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS) was conducted without language restriction up to and including February 1, 2020. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. Several cleft teams across the United States and Europe were contacted to obtain unpublished data. The eligibility criteria were observational studies with original data that statistically compared individuals with OC without syndromes and those without OC on any type of DA in primary and/or permanent dentition. Random effects meta-analysis through the Mantel-Haenszel estimator was used to evaluate the association between OC and DA based on odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThe literature search generated 933 records, and 75 full-text articles were reviewed. Twenty-six studies encompassing 15,213 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant associations between OC and agenesis (OR, 14.2; 95% CI, 9.4 to 21.3), supernumerary teeth (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.3 to 9.7), developmental enamel defects (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.5 to 9.0), microdontia (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 4.0 to 54.6), peg-shaped anterior teeth (OR, 12.2; 95% CI, 3.6 to 41.2), taurodontism (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7), tooth malposition and/or transposition (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.8 to 11.5), tooth rotation (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 8.2), and tooth impaction (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 12.2). The OR estimates of the reviewed studies exhibited significant heterogeneity (
conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, the available evidence suggests that individuals with OCs are more likely to present with a range of DAs than their unaffected peers. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The findings of the current review suggest that individuals with orofacial clefts (OCs) are more likely to present with a range of dental anomalies than their unaffected peers. Understanding the association between OCs and dental anomalies is essential in guiding clinicians during treatment-planning procedures and is important in raising our awareness of the possible need for future dental treatment for patients with OCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.