Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029876›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2021

Two Methods, One Goal: Structural Differences between Cocrystallization and Crystal Soaking to Discover Ligand Binding Poses.

Barbara Wienen-Schmidt, Matthias Oebbeke, Khang Ngo, Andreas Heine, Gerhard Klebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Methods for the Investigation of Protein-Ligands Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Di-Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cryo-EM structures of apo and atorvastatin-bound human 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara Wienen-SchmidtInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-6717
Matthias OebbekeInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-4798
Khang NgoInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-7975
Andreas HeineInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5285-4089
Gerhard KlebeInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-390X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In lead optimization, protein crystallography is an indispensable tool to analyze drug binding. Binding modes and non-covalent interaction inventories are essential to design follow-up synthesis candidates. Two protocols are commonly applied to produce protein-ligand complexes: cocrystallization and soaking. Because of its time and cost effectiveness, soaking is the more popular method. Taking eight ligand hinge binders of protein kinase A, we demonstrate that cocrystallization is superior. Particularly for flexible proteins, such as kinases, and larger ligands cocrystallization captures more reliable the correct binding pose and induced protein adaptations. The geometrical discrepancies between soaking and cocrystallization appear smaller for fragment-sized ligands. For larger flexible ligands that trigger conformational changes of the protein, soaking can be misleading and underestimates the number of possible polar interactions due to inadequate, highly impaired positions of protein amino-acid side and main chain atoms. Thus, if applicable cocrystallization should be the gold standard to study protein-ligand complexes.

Indexed as

LigandsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesDrug DiscoveryHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein SubunitsRecombinant ProteinsTrypsinCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesLigandsProtein SubunitsRecombinant ProteinsTrypsinbinding mode analysiscocrystallizationCrystal structure analysisdrug design and optimizationinteraction inventorykinasesPKAsoakingtrypsin

Identifiers

PMID33029876
PMCPMC7821316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.