Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029872›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2021

Liver perfusion MRI in a rodent model of cirrhosis: Agreement with bulk-flow phase-contrast MRI and noninvasive evaluation of inflammation in chronic liver disease using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery arterial spin labelling and tissue T1.

Manil Dinesh Chouhan, Rajiv Ramasawmy, Alan Bainbridge, Adrienne Campbell-Washburn, Steve Halligan, Nathan Davies, Simon Walker-Samuel, Mark F Lythgoe, Rajeshwar Prosad Mookerjee, Stuart Andrew Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manil Dinesh ChouhanUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-1002
Rajiv RamasawmyUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Alan BainbridgeUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Adrienne Campbell-WashburnUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Steve HalliganUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Nathan DaviesUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Simon Walker-SamuelUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Mark F LythgoeUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Rajeshwar Prosad MookerjeeUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Stuart Andrew TaylorUCL Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
UCL Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT092186Wellcome Trust WT100247MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive measurements of liver perfusion and fibrosis in cirrhotic small animals can help develop treatments for haemodynamic complications of liver disease. Here, we measure liver perfusion in cirrhotic rodents using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery arterial spin labelling (FAIR ASL), evaluating agreement with previously validated caval subtraction phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI) total liver blood flow (TLBF). Baseline differences in cirrhotic rodents and the haemodynamic effects of acute inflammation were investigated using FAIR ASL and tissue T1. Sprague-Dawley rats (nine bile duct ligated [BDL] and ten sham surgery controls) underwent baseline hepatic FAIR ASL with T1 measurement and caval subtraction PCMRI (with two-dimensional infra-/supra-hepatic inferior vena caval studies), induction of inflammation with intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and repeat liver FAIR ASL with T1 measurement after ~90 minutes. The mean difference between FAIR ASL hepatic perfusion and caval subtraction PCMRI TLBF was -51 ± 30 ml/min/100 g (Bland-Altman 95% limits-of-agreement ±258 ml/min/100 g). The FAIR ASL coefficient of variation was smaller than for caval subtraction PCMRI (29.3% vs 50.1%; P = .03). At baseline, FAIR ASL liver perfusion was lower in BDL rats (199 ± 32 ml/min/100 g vs sham 316 ± 24 ml/min/100 g; P = .01) but liver T1 was higher (BDL 1533 ± 50 vs sham 1256 ± 18 ms; P = .0004). Post-LPS FAIR ASL liver perfusion response differences were observed between sham/BDL rats (P = .02), approaching significance in sham (+78 ± 33 ml/min/100 g; P = .06) but not BDL rats (-49 ± 40 ml/min/100 g; P = .47). Post-LPS differences in liver tissue T1 were nonsignificant (P = .35). FAIR ASL hepatic perfusion and caval subtraction PCMRI TLBF agreement was modest, with significant baseline FAIR ASL liver perfusion and tissue T1 differences in rodents with advanced cirrhosis compared with controls. Following inflammatory stress, differences in hepatic perfusion response were detected between cirrhotic/control animals, but liver T1 was unaffected. Findings underline the potential of FAIR ASL in the assessment of vasoactive treatments for patients with chronic liver disease and inflammation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArea Under CurveBile DuctsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDisease Models, AnimalInflammationLigationLipopolysaccharidesLiver CirculationLiver Cirrhosis, ExperimentalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpin LabelsSubtraction TechniqueLipopolysaccharidesSpin Labelsarterial spin labellingchronic liver diseasecirrhosisinflammationliver perfusionliver T1phase-contrast MRIsepsis

Identifiers

PMID33029872
PMCPMC8427466
OpenAlexW3092592886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.