Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2021
Long-term analysis of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Open-label phase 3 results.
Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- IRAK4 degrader in hidradenitis suppurativa and atopic dermatitis: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2023Trial
- Two-Stage Surgical Management of Anogenital Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients on Biologic Therapy: A Retrospective Case Series.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Factors associated with therapeutic response to adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: evidence from the Belgian patients of the European Registry for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ERHS-Be).Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Data wobbles in hidradenitis suppurativa clinical trials and potential contributing factors: a retrospective review.International journal of women's dermatology · 2024Article
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Molecular Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Management-A Systematic Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Drug Survival of Anti Interleukin-17 and Interleukin -23 Agents after Adalimumab Failure in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Pilot Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Article
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: 12-week interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.The Journal of dermatology · 2022Observational
- Single-center survey of biologic use for inflammatory skin diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.The Journal of dermatology · 2021Article
- New perspectives on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021Review
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of the Biologic and Small Molecule Immunomodulatory Treatments.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This phase 3, multicenter, open-label single-arm study evaluated adalimumab (ADA) in Japanese patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Fifteen patients received ADA 160 mg s.c. at week 0, 80 mg at week 2 and 40 mg at week 4 and every week thereafter. At any time after week 52, patients were given the option to receive 80 mg ADA every other week or remain on 40 mg every week. The primary end-point (achievement of HS Clinical Response [HiSCR] at week 24) and results up to week 24 were published previously. Secondary end-points included total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, 30% or more and 1 unit or more reduction in Patient's Global Assessment of Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS30), modified Sartorius score and quality of life (QoL). After 12 weeks of ADA treatment, the achievement rate in HiSCR was 86.7%; HiSCR achievement rate was sustained through week 52 at 66.7%. Improvements at week 12 were also seen in the proportion of patients achieving an AN count of 0-2; NRS30 response rate among the nine patients with a baseline NRS of 3 or more; mean decrease in modified Sartorius score (61.4); and QoL as assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; these improvements were maintained through 52 weeks. Similar efficacy was observed when patients switched dosing from ADA 40 mg every week to ADA 80 mg every other week. There were no new safety findings with ADA 40 mg weekly dosing during the study, and no differences in safety were found between patients who switched to 80 mg ADA every other week and patients who remained on 40 mg every week. The results of this study indicate that long-term ADA treatment is effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate to severe HS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.