Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029756›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

GRN, NOTCH3, FN1, and PINK1 expression in eutopic endometrium - potential biomarkers in the detection of endometriosis - a pilot study.

Isabell Holzer, Amanda Machado Weber, Anne Marshall, Alexander Freis, Julia Jauckus, Thomas Strowitzki, Ariane Germeyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabell HolzerDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. i.holzer@stud.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-6913
Amanda Machado WeberDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne MarshallDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander FreisDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia JauckusDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas StrowitzkiDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ariane GermeyerDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndometriosis (EM) is a common gynecological disease affecting 10-15% of women of reproductive age. However, molecular mechanisms and pathogenesis are still not completely understood. Furthermore, due to the absence of a reliable clinical biomarker, the only viable method for the often-delayed definitive diagnosis is laparoscopic surgery. Our objective was to analyze molecular differences of selected endometrial proteins and genes of women suffering from different stages of EM compared with healthy women to evaluate potential clinical biomarkers.

methodsWe analyzed eutopic endometrial tissue samples from women undergoing a laparoscopic surgery (n = 58). mRNA gene expression of progranulin (GRN), neurogenic locus notch homolog protein (NOTCH3), fibronectin (FN1), and PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) was analyzed using qRT-PCR. Protein expression was determined using ELISA and immunohistochemistry.

resultsSignificant differences in gene expression between the different stages of the disease were noted for GRN, NOTCH3, FN1, and PINK1 (p < 0.05). The endometrium of women with minimal EM (ASRM I) showed the highest mRNA expression. Protein levels of GRN and FN1 on the other hand were significantly decreased in the endometrium of women with EM compared with those of healthy controls. Furthermore, for GRN and FN1, we could detect a correlation of protein expression with the severity of the disease.

conclusionOur findings suggest a potential use of GRN and FN1 as clinical biomarkers to detect endometriosis. In addition, GRN, NOTCH3, FN1, and PINK1 could potentially be useful to differentiate between the underlying stages of the disease. However, a validation with a larger study population is needed.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEndometriosisEndometriumFemaleFibronectinsGene Expression RegulationHumansPilot ProjectsProgranulinsProtein KinasesPTEN-Induced Putative KinaseReceptor, Notch3BiomarkersFibronectinsFN1 protein, humanGRN protein, humanNOTCH3 protein, humanProgranulinsProtein KinasesPTEN-Induced Putative KinaseReceptor, Notch3BiomarkersEndometriosisFibronectinProgranulin

Identifiers

PMID33029756
PMCPMC7642058
OpenAlexW3092108457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.