Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029749›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2021

The prognostic role of prognostic nutritional index in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Min Tang, Zhongxiong Jia, Ju Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with endostar and concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min TangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yu Zhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-5936
Zhongxiong JiaDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yu Zhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Ju ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yu Zhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China. Zhangjucq@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has never been systematically reviewed. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis.

methodsWe performed comprehensive research via Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to explore the relationship between PNI and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and clinical features. Both univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were used.

resultsA total of 8 eligible studies including 3631 patients were ultimately enrolled. A low PNI level was significantly associated with a shorter OS [(HR 2.06, P < 0.00001; UVA) and (HR 1.78, P < 0.00001; MVA)], PFS [(HR 2.27, P = 0.006; UVA) and (HR 1.45, P = 0.0003; MVA)] and DMFS [(HR 2.06, P < 0.00001; UVA) and (HR 2.04, P < 0.00001; MVA)]. However, only one study reported the LRFFS of NPC patients, and there was no significant difference [HR 1.68, P = 0.26]. Furthermore, female patients, higher tumor stage, a lower alanine transaminase (ALT) level and a lower white blood cell (WBC) level were associated with a lower PNI level.

conclusionOur meta-analysis indicated that NPC patients with a low PNI level had worse OS, PFS and DMFS, and a low PNI level was associated with female patients, higher tumor stage, a lower ALT level and a lower WBC level. These findings indicate that PNI is a promising prognostic biomarker.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNutrition AssessmentFemaleHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsMeta-analysisNasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognosisPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.