ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2021
Red Cell Distribution Width as a Marker of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear association between red cell distribution width/albumin ratio and peripheral arterial disease in the NHANES: a cross-section study with propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Incorporation of Laboratory Test Biomarkers Into Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score Improves Prediction of Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Post-percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether red cell distribution width (RDW) was associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 1723 consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI, a total of 230 (13.3%) met the diagnostic criteria of PMI. The high RDW (≥ 12.6%) group tended to have PMI (15.4% vs. 11.2%, P = 0.010). RDW was an independent predictor of PMI whether as a categorical variable (adjusted odds ratio = 1.442, 95% confidence interval = 1.088 to 1.911, P = 0.011) or a continuous variable (adjusted odds ratio = 1.236, 95% confidence interval = 1.079 to 1.415, P = 0.002). High RDW was also significantly associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during follow-up. However, anemia was not independently associated with PMI or MACE in the current study. In conclusion, RDW showed strong and independent association with PMI in patients undergoing elective PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33029742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.