Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029669›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2020

On the Problem of Reconstructing a Mixture of RNA Structures.

Torin Greenwood, Christine E Heitsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Torin GreenwoodNorth Dakota State University, Fargo, USA. torin.greenwood@ndsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4598-7059
Christine E HeitschGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

ConProject-001R01GM126554 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HEITSCH, CHRISTINE E · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
National Science Foundation DMS1344199NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of RNA sequences are now known to exist in some distribution with two or more different stable structures. Recent algorithms attempt to reconstruct such mixtures using the list of nucleotides in a sequence in conjunction with auxiliary experimental footprinting data. In this paper, we demonstrate some challenges which remain in addressing this problem; in particular we consider the difficulty of reconstructing a mixture of two RNA structures across a spectrum of different relative abundances. Although progress has been made in identifying the stable structures present, it remains nontrivial to predict the relative abundance of each within the experimentally sampled mixture. Because the ratio of structures present can change depending on experimental conditions, it is the footprinting data-and not the sequence-which must encode information on changes in the relative abundance. Here, we use simulated experimental data to demonstrate that there exist RNA sequences and relative abundance combinations which cannot be recovered by current methods. We then prove that this is not a single exception, but rather part of the rule. In particular, we show, using a Nussinov-Jacobson model, that recovering the relative abundances is difficult for a large proportion of RNA structure pairs. Lastly, we use information theory to establish a framework for quantifying how useful auxiliary data is in predicting the relative abundance of a structure. Together, these results demonstrate that aspects of the problem of reconstructing a mixture of RNA structures from experimental data remain open.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRNAAlgorithmsBase SequenceMathematical ConceptsNucleic Acid ConformationNucleotidesNucleotidesRNAAuxiliary dataRNA secondary structureThermodynamic optimization

Identifiers

PMID33029669
PMCPMC8260035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.