ArticleJournal of radiation research2021
A slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network for segmenting organs at risk in head and neck cancer.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning algorithm performance in contouring head and neck organs at risk: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Deep learning-based target tracking with X-ray images for radiotherapy: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Exploring the impact of network depth on 3D U-Net-based dose prediction for cervical cancer radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical acceptance and dosimetric impact of automatically delineated elective target and organs at risk for head and neck MR-Linac patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Accurate and robust auto-segmentation of head and neck organ-at-risks based on a novel CNN fine-tuning workflow.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs-at-Risk with Clinical Partially Labeled Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A feasibility study for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT using Monte Carlo dose calculation and deep learning-based modelling of EPID detector response.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Automatic Segmentation of Mandible from Conventional Methods to Deep Learning-A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Review of Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For deep learning networks used to segment organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck (H&N) cancers, the class-imbalance problem between small volume OARs and whole computed tomography (CT) images results in delineation with serious false-positives on irrelevant slices and unnecessary time-consuming calculations. To alleviate this problem, a slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network was developed and validated. In the developed two-step segmentation model, a slice classification model was firstly utilized to classify CT slices into six categories in the craniocaudal direction. Then the target categories for different OARs were pushed to the different 3D encoder-decoder segmentation networks, respectively. All the patients were divided into training (n = 120), validation (n = 30) and testing (n = 20) datasets. The average accuracy of the slice classification model was 95.99%. The Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance, respectively, for each OAR were as follows: right eye (0.88 ± 0.03 and 1.57 ± 0.92 mm), left eye (0.89 ± 0.03 and 1.35 ± 0.43 mm), right optic nerve (0.72 ± 0.09 and 1.79 ± 1.01 mm), left optic nerve (0.73 ± 0.09 and 1.60 ± 0.71 mm), brainstem (0.87 ± 0.04 and 2.28 ± 0.99 mm), right temporal lobe (0.81 ± 0.12 and 3.28 ± 2.27 mm), left temporal lobe (0.82 ± 0.09 and 3.73 ± 2.08 mm), right temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.13 and 1.79 ± 0.79 mm), left temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.16 and 1.98 ± 1.48 mm), mandible (0.89 ± 0.02 and 1.66 ± 0.51 mm), right parotid (0.77 ± 0.07 and 7.30 ± 4.19 mm) and left parotid (0.71 ± 0.12 and 8.41 ± 4.84 mm). The total segmentation time was 40.13 s. The 3D encoder-decoder network facilitated by the slice classification model demonstrated superior performance in accuracy and efficiency in segmenting OARs in H&N CT images. This may significantly reduce the workload for radiation oncologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.