Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029634›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

A slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network for segmenting organs at risk in head and neck cancer.

Shuming Zhang, Hao Wang, Suqing Tian, Xuyang Zhang, Jiaqi Li, Runhong Lei, Mingze Gao, Chunlei Liu, Li Yang, Xinfang Bi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuming ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Suqing TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuyang ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiaqi LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Runhong LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mingze GaoBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Chunlei LiuBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Li YangBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xinfang BiBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Linlin ZhuBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Senhua ZhuBeijing Linking Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ting XuInstitute of Science and Technology Development, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Ruijie YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNPeking University · CNBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For deep learning networks used to segment organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck (H&N) cancers, the class-imbalance problem between small volume OARs and whole computed tomography (CT) images results in delineation with serious false-positives on irrelevant slices and unnecessary time-consuming calculations. To alleviate this problem, a slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network was developed and validated. In the developed two-step segmentation model, a slice classification model was firstly utilized to classify CT slices into six categories in the craniocaudal direction. Then the target categories for different OARs were pushed to the different 3D encoder-decoder segmentation networks, respectively. All the patients were divided into training (n = 120), validation (n = 30) and testing (n = 20) datasets. The average accuracy of the slice classification model was 95.99%. The Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance, respectively, for each OAR were as follows: right eye (0.88 ± 0.03 and 1.57 ± 0.92 mm), left eye (0.89 ± 0.03 and 1.35 ± 0.43 mm), right optic nerve (0.72 ± 0.09 and 1.79 ± 1.01 mm), left optic nerve (0.73 ± 0.09 and 1.60 ± 0.71 mm), brainstem (0.87 ± 0.04 and 2.28 ± 0.99 mm), right temporal lobe (0.81 ± 0.12 and 3.28 ± 2.27 mm), left temporal lobe (0.82 ± 0.09 and 3.73 ± 2.08 mm), right temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.13 and 1.79 ± 0.79 mm), left temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.16 and 1.98 ± 1.48 mm), mandible (0.89 ± 0.02 and 1.66 ± 0.51 mm), right parotid (0.77 ± 0.07 and 7.30 ± 4.19 mm) and left parotid (0.71 ± 0.12 and 8.41 ± 4.84 mm). The total segmentation time was 40.13 s. The 3D encoder-decoder network facilitated by the slice classification model demonstrated superior performance in accuracy and efficiency in segmenting OARs in H&N CT images. This may significantly reduce the workload for radiation oncologists.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImaging, Three-DimensionalHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansOrgans at RiskTomography, X-Ray Computedautomatic segmentationdeep learninghead and neckorgans at riskradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33029634
PMCPMC7779351
OpenAlexW3092291820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.