Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029431›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2020

Stem cell applications in regenerative medicine for stress urinary incontinence: A review of effectiveness based on clinical trials.

Bara Barakat, Knut Franke, Samer Schakaki, Sameh Hijazi, Viktoria Hasselhof, Thomas-Alexander Vögeli

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bara BarakatDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Knut FrankeDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Samer SchakakiDepartment of Urology, Hospital Osnabrück, Osnabruck, Germany.
Sameh HijaziDepartment of Urology, Hospital Ibbenbüren, Ibbenbüren, Germany.
Viktoria HasselhofSt. Elizabeth Boardman Family Medicine, Boardman, OH, USA.
Thomas-Alexander VögeliDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universityhospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
LVR-Klinik für Orthopädie Viersen · DEKlinikum Osnabrück · DERWTH Aachen University · DEStadtarchiv Ibbenbüren · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the current state, therapeutic benefit and safety of urethral injection of autologous stem cells for the treatment stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND

methodsA selective database search of PubMed, the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted to validate the effectiveness of stem cell-based therapy. The search included clinical trials published up until 4 January 2020, written in English, and included cohorts of women and men who had received stem cell-based therapy for SUI. The search used the following keywords in various combinations: 'stem cell therapy', 'cell-based therapy for SUI', 'regenerative medicine for SUI', and 'tissue engineering'. The success rates were assessed according to cough test, urodynamics, pad tests, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The primary endpoint was continence rate to measure objectively the effect of the treatment.

resultsWe identified four clinical trials using local injections of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), 11 trails with muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs), and two trails with human umbilical cord blood stem cells (HUCBs) and total nucleated cells (TNCs). The median improvement rate of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after ADSCs, MDSCs, TNCs, HUCBs injections were 88%, 77%, 89%, 36% (improvement rate: 1-2 pads) at a mean (range) follow-up of 6 (1-72) months. The cell sources, methods of cell processing, cell number, and implantation techniques differed considerably between studies. Most of the periurethral injections were at the 3, 5, 7, and 9 o'clock positions and for submucosa were at the 4, 6, and 8 o'clock positions. No significant postoperative complications were reported.

conclusionDespite many challenges in stem cell-based therapy for treating SUI, it appears to provide, in both male and female patients, acceptable functional results with minimal side-effects and complications. In the future, more clinical trials should be funded in order to optimise stem cell-based therapy and evaluate long-term outcomes. ABBREVIATIONS: ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; BMSCs: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell; CLPP: cough leak-point pressure; FPL: functional profile length; HUCB: human umbilical cord blood stem cell; ICIQ-(QOL)(SF)(UI): International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (Quality of life) (-Urinary incontinence Short Form) (-Urinary Incontinence); IIQ-7: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short form; I-QOL: Incontinence quality of life questionnaire; ISD: intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency; MDSC: muscle-derived stem cell; MUCP: maximum urethral closure pressure; NR: not reported; Pdet-max: maximum detrusor pressure; PVR: post-void residual urine volume; Q

Indexed as

cell therapystem cellsStress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID33029431
PMCPMC7473152
OpenAlexW3017003377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.