Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029422›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2020

An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following radical prostatectomy: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Ali Merhe, Nassib Abou Heidar, Mohamad Hout, Gerges Bustros, Aurelie Mailhac, Hani Tamim, Wassim Wazzan, Muhammad Bulbul, Rami Nasr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali MerheDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8749-1222
Nassib Abou HeidarDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3811-5543
Mohamad HoutDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gerges BustrosDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Aurelie MailhacAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-0139
Hani TamimAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-4362
Wassim WazzanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Muhammad BulbulDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rami NasrDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-7779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform a time-to-complication analysis for radical prostatectomy (RP) and computing risk factors for these complications, as RP is established as a first-line treatment for localised prostate cancer with excellent oncological outcomes but is not without its complications. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to analyse data of patients who underwent RP, between 2008 and 2015, with the primary endpoint of time-to-complications. Categorical variables were analysed using descriptive statistics and continuous variables were recorded as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) such as timing of complications. Multivariable regression analyses were used to analyse time-to-complication and its effect on other outcomes. A

resultsThe overall 30-day complication rate was 7.54% and was equally distributed before and after discharge. Bleeding/transfusion (3.37%), urinary tract infection (1.58%), deep venous thrombosis (DVT; 0.74%), and wound infection (1.08%) were the five most common complications after RP. The median (IQR) time-to-complication unique for each complication was: bleeding/transfusion occurred on the same operative day (1), renal complications occurred at 4 (2-6) days, sepsis at 12 (6.5-17.5) days, DVT at 11 (5.5-16.5) days, pneumonia at 4 (0.5-7.5) days, and cardiac arrest occurred at 5 (1.75-8.25) days. After discharge complications were associated with greater odds of re-admission (odds ratio [OR] 16.40,

conclusionSeveral risk factors predict pre- and post-discharge complication rates. Knowledge regarding the timing of complications and their respective risk factors should improve patient-physician communication and prediction, and thus patient care. ABBREVIATIONS: ACS: American College of Surgeons; BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; Hct: haematocrit; IQR: interquartile range; LOS: length of stay; NSQIP: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; OR: odds ratio; RP: radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

length of staymortalityprostatectomyTiming of complications

Identifiers

PMID33029422
PMCPMC7473202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.