ArticleArab journal of urology2020
A comparative study between sacral neuromodulation and intravesical botulinum toxin injection for patients with refractory overactive bladder.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of Different Treatment Outcomes for Refractory Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Toxins · 2025Pooled it
- Sacral and Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation for the Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Overactive Bladder: Closing the Gaps in Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Parameter Selection.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities in Overactive Bladder: A Rapid Overview.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the efficacy, safety, patient compliance and quality of life (QoL) (early and at 6 months after treatment), in a group of Iraqi female patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB), treated with intradetrusor botulinum toxin A (BTX) injections vs sacral neuromodulation (SNM). PATIENTS AND
methodsA prospective, clinical interventional study of 37 female patients assessed by history, physical examination, voiding diary, ultrasonography (US), and urodynamics. The patients were assigned to one of two groups: Group 1, treated with cystoscopic BTX injections; and Group 2, treated with SNM. Response to treatment was assessed by voiding diary, the Treatment Benefit Scale, a modified Quality of Life scale, urine culture, and abdominal US.
resultsThe mean age of the patients in Group 1 (BTX) was 43.8 years and in Group 2 (SNM) was 37.2 years. OAB-wet was diagnosed in 11 patients in Group 1 and 10 in Group 2. At the 6-month follow-up there were 14/16 and 12/15 positive responders, in groups 1 and 2, respectively; with no major complications. All the responders had a significant improvement in their overall QoL after both types of treatment.
conclusionsBoth BTX and SNM, in our experience, were safe and effective in managing our patients with refractory OAB after 6 months of follow-up, which was also reflected by an improvement in their QoL. ABBREVIATIONS: BTX: botulinum toxin A; IPG: implantable pulse generator; OAB: overactive bladder; PVR: post-void residual urine; QoL: quality of life; SNM: sacral neuromodulation; UDS, urodynamics; UI, urinary incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.